<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-TRYC8MNY/08139e54-ad05-4b1e-8fef-947c744931e7/PDF"><dcterms:extent>377 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-TRYC8MNY/0401ec90-ebe5-4e33-8df3-af12b5da8dfc/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>0 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1965-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1965</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-TRYC8MNY"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-ETPSIC7M" /><dcterms:issued>2025</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Ule, Aljaž</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:2</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:62</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 299-314</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0040-3598</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI:10.51936/tip.62.2.299</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID_HOST:244351235</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-TRYC8MNY</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Fakulteta za družbene vede</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Teorija in praksa</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">bounded rationality</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">coordination problems</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">eksperimentalno odločanje</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">experimental decision-making</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">individualno usmerjeno mišljenje</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">individual-oriented reasoning</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">omejena racionalnost</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">problemi usklajevanja</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">team reasoning</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">timsko mišljenje</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">usklajevanja</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1965-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Theories about pure social coordination with experimental evidence from Slovenia|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">The article presents a discussion of the results of laboratory experiments on social coordination that allowed various forms of reasoning to be used. The experiments were conducted in the TIG laboratory at the University of Primorska. We investigate the type of reasoning the participants used while making decisions in the laboratory. In particular, two contemporary theories of coordination are tested, the first describing a team-oriented and the second an individual-oriented type of thinking. T he participants’ coordination behaviour shows that young people hold the potential to develop both some form of cooperative reasoning and a more individualistic, boundedly rational focus on their own success, such as referred to in cognitive hierarchy theory. Instead of team reasoning, we f ind evidence in support for a simpler, albeit less profitable odd-one-out heuristic</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Članek predstavlja razpravo o rezultatih laboratorijskih eksperimentov o družbeni koordinaciji, ki omogočajo različne oblike mišljenja in so bili izvedeni v laboratoriju TIG Univerze na Primorskem. Raziskuje, kakšno vrsto mišljenja uporabljajo udeleženci v naših eksperimentalnih situacijah odločanja. Ob tem primerjam predvsem dve sodobni teoriji koordinacije, od katerih ena opisuje timsko, druga pa individualno usmerjeno vrsto razmišljanja. Koordinirano vedenje udeležencev v poskusu kaže, da imajo mladi potencial za razvijanje tako sodelovalnega sklepanja kot tudi bolj individualistično, omejeno racionalno naravnanost, usmerjeno v lasten uspeh – kot jo opisuje teorija kognitivnih hierarhij. Namesto timskega mišljenja se udeleženci poslužujejo enostavnejše, a manj dobičkonosne izbire opcije, ki ne sodi med ostale</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-TRYC8MNY"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-TRYC8MNY" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-TRYC8MNY/08139e54-ad05-4b1e-8fef-947c744931e7/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-TRYC8MNY/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-TRYC8MNY" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>