412 KB69 KB201320252019Šorli, Mojcaštevilka:2letnik:7str. 45-74DOI:10.4312/slo2.0.2019.2.45-74ISSN:2335-2736COBISSID_HOST:70895202URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-T8BT3GR1enZnanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v LjubljaniSlovenščina 2.0androcentricityandrocentričnostdiscoursediskurzgender-sensitive language usespolno občutljiva raba jezikaSpol in jezik na robu pameti| med slovnico in ideologijo|The present text revisits the public debate that followed the passing of "Decision 41" by the Senate of the Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana, on a language policy introducing gender-sensitive language use in the Faculty's administra-tive documents. The debate attracted public attention and media interest for several months, culminating in a Round Table on Gender and Language, which took place at the UL Faculty of Arts almost exactly one year ago, on 23 October 2018. While re-evaluating the views expressed in the debate from a temporal distance, this paper is an attempt to continue the debate on gender categories and gender identities, focusing on androcentricity in language. In addition to highlighting the theoretical background that is (or should be) the driving force of the debate, we also performed a simple statistical analysis of the collected opinions and responses by media representation and gender representation. In the qualitative part of the analysis, we were primarily interested in which (apparent) expert and ideological oppositions fuelled the specific rhetoric and discourse adopted in the debatePričujoče besedilo je povzemanje in analiza javne razprave, do katere je prišlo po sprejetju 41. sklepa Senata Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani z dne 25. aprila 2018 o novi spolni dikciji v fakultetnih pravilnikih in ki je nato ob zani-manju medijev potekala več mesecev, vrhunec pa dosegla pred približno enim letom, 23. oktobra 2018, na Okrogli mizi Jezik in spol na Filozofski fakulteti UL. Obenem je ob ponovnem vrednotenju izraženih stališč z nekoliko časovne distance prispevek poskus nadaljevanja razprave o spolnih kategorijah in os-poljenih identitetah ter androcentričnosti v jeziku. Poleg osvetlitve teoretskega ozadja, ki je (ali bi moralo biti) gonilo razprave, smo opravili tudi preprosto statistično analizo odzivov glede na zastopanost v medijih in zastopanost po spolu. V kvalitativnem delu analize nas je zanimalo predvsem, katere strokovne in ideološke (navidezne) opozicije so napajale posamezne retorike in diskurze, ki so obarvali razpravoTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaZnanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete