<Record><identifier xmlns="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">URN:NBN:SI:doc-T7B690ZF</identifier><date>2016</date><creator>Alberti, Gábor</creator><creator>Farkas, Judit</creator><relation>documents/doc/T/URN_NBN_SI_doc-T7B690ZF_001.pdf</relation><relation>documents/doc/T/URN_NBN_SI_doc-T7B690ZF_001.txt</relation><format format_type="type">article</format><format format_type="issue">letn. 56</format><format format_type="extent">str. 111-125</format><identifier identifier_type="ISSN">0024-3922</identifier><identifier identifier_type="COBISSID">63245666</identifier><identifier identifier_type="URN">URN:NBN:SI:doc-T7B690ZF</identifier><language>eng</language><language>hun</language><publisher>Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete</publisher><source>Linguistica (Ljubljana)</source><rights>BY-SA</rights><subject language_type_id="eng">hongrois</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">Hungarian</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">madžarščina</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">morphologie</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">nom</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">oblikoslovje</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">possession inaliénable</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">samostalnik</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">svojilnost</subject><title>The relationship between (in)alienable possession and the (three potential) forms of possessed nouns in Hungarian</title></Record>