606 KB29 KB194820252019Krvina, Domenštevilka:2letnik:67str. 159-170ISSN:0350-6894COBISSID_HOST:44823853URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-SYASJTP3slSlavistično društvo SlovenijeSlavistična revijaaspect (linguistics)gender (linguistics)glagolski vidSlovenian languageslovenščinaspol (jezikoslovje)Nezaznamovanost nedovršnika v slovenščini kot vzporednica moškemu slovničnemu spolu|This article examines the possibility that the imperfective in Slovene may not explicitly denote process or drawn out action and thus an action's duration or repetition, but simply communicate that it takes place, constitutes it, and thus simply expresses its existence. Such use of the imperfective limits itself mainly to: a) general reporting of or inquiry into an action (We did that. Have you eaten today?); b) negation (I never wrote that.); c) the use of imperfective or bi-aspectual verbs in cases when process (duration) of an action is hard to pinpoint (That really hurt them. They will be punished. The data were carefully analyzed.)Nedovršnik (tudi) v slovenščini lahko ne izraža eksplicitno potekanja, iztekanja in s tem trajanja dejanja ali njegove ponavljalnosti, pač pa o dejanju le poroča, ga zgolj poimenuje - in tako izraža zgolj njegov obstoj. Taka raba nedovršnika je zlasti trojna: a) splošno poročanje ali poizvedovanje o dejanju (To smo že delali; ali si danes že jedel?), b) nikalnost (Tega nisem nikoli pisal), c) raba nedovršnikov ali glagolov kategorialno obojega vida, ko je nedovršnosti težko pripisati jedrni pomen potekanja, iztekanja (trajanja) dejanja (To jim je zelo škodovalo; kaznovali jih še bodo; podatke so natančno analizirali)TEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaSlavistično društvo Slovenije