32 KB818 KB31 KB197320132007Hrovatin, JasnaKitek Kuzman, Manja8 straništevilka:82str. 63-70ISSN:0351-3114COBISSID:1873318URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-SXLP6BI6slInštitut za gozdno in lesno gospodarstvoUniverza v Ljubljani, Biotehniška fakulteta, Oddelek za gozdarstvo & Oddelek za lesarstvoZbornik gozdarstva in lesarstvaanketejavno mnenjelesena gradnjaSloveniaSlovenijastanovanjska gradnjaRaziskava stališč o leseni gradnji v Sloveniji v letu 2006|In residential buildings, prefabricated wooden houses constitute minor part ofall buildings in Slovenia. The reasons pertaining to the relatively low occurrence of prefabricated wooden buildings today are assessed in the presentstudy. The Slovenian public opinion survey on wooden building 2006 examined, among other issues, public attitude towards wooden buildings and itsadvantages. Data collection was performed by CATI method. Results of publicresearch clearly indicate the users' lack of knowledge about wooden buildings. The majority of respondents living in single-family houses oppose the idea of timber-framed penthouse. More than a half of all respondents agreed that wood is suitable material for constructions, while 30% disagreed. Most of the respondents support increased government spending for ecological building. The percentages of respondents, who believe that wooden houses offerhealthier living conditions than brick-concrete buildings, are about the same. Public opinion survey presents empirical background for designing eventual wooden building promotional campaigns in futureLesena gradnja predstavlja na področju stanovanjskih stavb v Sloveniji le majhen delež celotne gradnje. Želeli smo ugotoviti, kaj je vzrok tako majhnegadeleža lesene gradnje v Sloveniji. Z javnomnenjsko raziskavo "Slovensko javno mnenje o leseni gradnji" smo anketirance spraševali o poznavanju lesene gradnje in njenih prednostih. Zbiranje podatkov je bilo opravljeno z metodo CATI. Ugotovljeno je bilo, da javnost ni dovolj seznanjenas prednostmi lesene gradnje.Večina vprašanih, ki živi v individualnihiši, nasprotuje leseni nadgradnji. Več kot polovico vprašanih soglaša, da je les primeren material za stavbno pohištvo in gradbene konstrukcije. O povečanju proračunskih sredstev za ekološko gradnjo ima javnost pozitivno mnenje. O trditvi, da lesena gradnja omogoča bolj zdravo bivalno okolje kot klasična zidana, ima javnost enakomerno porazdeljeno mnenje. Raziskava kot merjenje stališč javnosti je primerno empirično izhodišče za pripravo morebitne kampanje obveščanja javnosti o prednostih lesene gradnjeTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Biotehniška fakulteta