{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-SLKGOQF5/f04e7e22-ecae-4bb1-b668-d3dbb31ec5cb/HTML","dcterms:extent":"73 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-SLKGOQF5/4aea9d20-a50d-4a22-bc1c-7bdbf7f5f863/PDF","dcterms:extent":"2378 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-SLKGOQF5/1a36765e-a555-4123-bd80-39887d988c00/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"62 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"1965-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"1965"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-SLKGOQF5","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-ETPSIC7M"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Teorija in praksa"}],"dcterms:issued":"1999","dc:creator":["Jaklič, Andreja","Svetličič, Marjan"],"dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:2"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:36"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 181-202"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0040-3598","COBISSID:19128413","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-SLKGOQF5"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Fakulteta za sociologijo, politične vede in novinarstvo v Ljubljani"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Central Europe"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"članstvo"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Eastern Europe"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"European Union"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Evropska unija"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"mednarodne integracije"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Srednja Evropa"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"širitev"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Vzhodna Evropa"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q458"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"1965-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Širitev Evropske unije: ali navdušenje hlapi?|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"It seems that enthusiasm over extending European Union is vanishing among the member-states, as well as among the candidates. The reasons are various; member-states are worried about the (budgetary) costs, while the candidates face many difficulties in the negotiation processes and are disappointed, since the primary illusions do not realise. This is a worrying situation, similar to the times of establishing European community for coal and steel, when political and security reasons prevailed. It would be useful today to carry out the study of consequences for the case the process of extending EU would not be realised. Extending EU would be useful for both sides, its costs are negligible in comparison with dividends of peace, costs of agricultural policy and long-term benefits. Extension is not a gift, as some believe, but a mean of political and security stabilisation of Europe, bringing Europe back on the world map as a 'superpower' and the mean of strengthening the Europe's competitive position. However, there is a legitimative problem, since the listof candidates includes less developed countries, while the conditions of entrance are severe. Extending EU should be an instrument of development and not its consequence. It is unproductive to perform 'beauty contest' among the candidates, which would enter the EU first. The strengthening mutual co-operation would be more welcomed"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"V EU zaradi (proračunkih) stroškov, medtem ko pri kandidatkah kot posledica težav v procesih pogajanj in razočaranj, ker se ne uresničujejo prvotne iluzije navdušenje pada. Položaj danes podoben tistemu v času ustanavljanja ES za premog in jeklo, ko so prevladovali politični in varnostni razlogi. Zato bi tudi danes kazalo izdelati študijo posledic neširitve, ker so ti stroški lahko višji kot stroški širitve. Širitev EU je namreč koristna za obe strani, njeni stroški so majhni v primerjavi z dividendami miru ali stroški kmetijske politike in v primerjavi z dolgoročnimi koristmi. Širitev ni darilo, kot menijo nekateri, pač pa sredstvo politične in varnostne stabilizacije Evrope, povrnitve Evrope na svetovni zemljevid kot velesile in sredstvo krepitve konkurenčnosti Evrope. Legitimnostni problem sedanje širitve je, da zaobsega najmanj razvite kandidatke medtem, ko so pogoji vstopa najtrši. Širitev pa bi morala biti instrument razvoja ne pa njegova posledica. Neproduktivno je, da se med kandidatkami vrši lepotno tekmovanje, katera bo prva vstopila v EU. Zaželena bi bila krepitev medsebojnega sodelovanja"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-SLKGOQF5","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-SLKGOQF5"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-SLKGOQF5/4aea9d20-a50d-4a22-bc1c-7bdbf7f5f863/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-SLKGOQF5/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-SLKGOQF5"}}}}