297 KB31 KB201320252018Sovdat, Jadrankaletnik:44številka:6/7str. 1231-1240ISSN:0353-6521COBISSID:513832056URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-SIMRY4H3slLexperaPodjetje in delopravica glasovanja na referendumureferendumski sporustavno sodiščezakonodajni referendumJe v referendumskem sporu ustavnopravno kaj novega|The right to vote in a referendum is protected in a special judicial procedure referred to as the referendum dispute. A judge is the ulimate guardian of the lawfulness of a referendum. The result thereof should be an accurate reflection on the reeely expressed will of the voters. The article presents the views of the Slovene constitutional law theory on the referendum dispute and the positions of the Constitutional Court adopted in Decision U-I-191/17. By comparing these views and positions, it formulates new positions as to the referendum dispute and provides advice regarding the future legislative regulation thereofPravica do glasovanja na referendumu se varuje v posebnem postopku, ki se mu reče referendumski spor. Sodnik je zadnji varuh pravnosti referenduma. Njegov izid mora biti verodostojen odraz svobodno izražene volje glasovalcev. V prispevku so predstavljeni pogledi slovenske ustavnopravne teorije na referendumski spor in stališča ustavnega sodišča iz odločbe U-I-191/17. Z njihovo primerjavo so opredeljene novosti v stališčih o referendumskem sporu in oblikovani nasveti za njegovo bodočo zakonsko ureditevTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of Slovenia