<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-RSBARIBX/33f8b8b1-0946-4484-886e-73b81b15857d/PDF"><dcterms:extent>1937 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-RSBARIBX/3b9f38db-ccc4-4f5c-ac88-38306d1fe415/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>65 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1965-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1965</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-RSBARIBX"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-ETPSIC7M" /><dcterms:issued>2015</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Atanasova, Sara</dc:creator><dc:creator>Petrič, Gregor</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:52</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:6</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 1143-1166, 1247</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0040-3598</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:33787229</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-RSBARIBX</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Fakulteta za sociologijo, politične vede in novinarstvo v Ljubljani</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Teorija in praksa</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">communication</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Deliberative democracy</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Družinski zakonik</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Družinsko pravo</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Family law</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">komuniciranje</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Posvetovalna demokracija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Respect</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">spoštljivost</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Spoštovanje</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1965-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Spoštljivost v deliberaciji| konceptualni premisleki, alternativna operacionalizacija in empirična validacija|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Respect in communication is one of the key criteria for good deliberation, yet it is one of the unclearest concepts in the field of deliberation research with many critical issues in approaches to its measurement. The main purpose of the article is to present theoretical challenges in an attempt to produce a clearer definition of respect in deliberation, which then serves as a criterion to evaluate the validity of existing approaches to measuring respect in deliberation. On the basis of understanding respect as a factor influencing other components of deliberation, a hypothesis is formed which serves to analyse the criterion%s validity. When applying a logistic regression on a sample of discussions on the Family Act, the weak criterion validity of the alternative measurement instrument was found. However, this warrants further optimisation of the measurement instrument</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Spoštljivost komuniciranja je eden ključnih kriterijev kvalitetne deliberacije, hkrati pa tudi najbolj nejasen in problematično merjen pojem na področju raziskovanja deliberacije. Osrednji namen članka je predstaviti konceptualno-teoretične izzive pri poskusu natančnejše opredelitve pojma spoštljivosti, ki nato služijo kot prizma za evalvacijo veljavnosti obstoječih načinov merjenja spoštljivosti v deliberaciji. Na podlagi razprave o spoštljivosti kot dejavniku, ki vpliva na ostale komponente deliberacije, je osnovana hipoteza, ki služi preverjanju kriterijske veljavnosti. V empiričnem delu je na osnovi razprav o Družinskem zakoniku z uporabo logistične regresije ugotovljena šibka kriterijska veljavnost alternativnega merskega inštrumenta, ki pa odpira možnosti za nadaljnjo optimizacijo</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-RSBARIBX"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-RSBARIBX" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-RSBARIBX/33f8b8b1-0946-4484-886e-73b81b15857d/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-RSBARIBX/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-RSBARIBX" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>