<Record><identifier xmlns="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">URN:NBN:SI:doc-RRQRK183</identifier><date>2016</date><creator>Ramírez Ludena, Lorena</creator><relation>documents/doc/R/URN_NBN_SI_doc-RRQRK183_001.pdf</relation><relation>documents/doc/R/URN_NBN_SI_doc-RRQRK183_001.txt</relation><format format_type="issue">2016</format><format format_type="type">article</format><format format_type="extent">str. 11-32, 98</format><format format_type="volume">št. 28</format><identifier identifier_type="ISSN">1581-7652</identifier><identifier identifier_type="COBISSID">293548032</identifier><identifier identifier_type="URN">URN:NBN:SI:doc-RRQRK183</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>GV Revije</publisher><publisher>Pravna praksa</publisher><source>Revus (Ljubljana)</source><rights>BY-SA</rights><subject language_type_id="eng">law</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">nesoglasja</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">pozitivizem</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">pravne norme</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">pravo</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">teorija prava</subject><title>a pluralist reply to Dworkin's challenge</title><title>Legal disagreements</title></Record>