<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-R5IVLJAN/9d9474d1-acf2-4a91-8d3e-d17475639fe8/PDF"><dcterms:extent>7257 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-R5IVLJAN/fb44ac3c-8b10-458c-b96a-35be7c13821d/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>64 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1951-2026"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1951</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2026</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-R5IVLJAN"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-OE4S1HGI" /><dcterms:issued>2022</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Babič, Anže</dc:creator><dc:creator>Dolšek, Matjaž</dc:creator><dc:creator>Žižmond, Jure</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:letn. 71</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 34-47</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0017-2774</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID_HOST:98487555</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-R5IVLJAN</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Zveza društev gradbenih inženirjev in tehnikov Slovenije</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Gradbeni vestnik</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">building stock in Slovenia</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">civil engineering</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">časovno opredeljena ocena tveganja</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">gradbeništvo</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Ljubljana earthquake</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">ljubljanski potres</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">ocena tveganja na osnovi scenarija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">potresno tveganje</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">scenario-based seismic risk assessment</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">seismic risk</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">seismic stress test</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">seizmični stresni test</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">stavbni fond v Sloveniji</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">time-based seismic risk assessment</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1951-2026" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Potresno tveganje stavbnega fonda v Sloveniji| Seismic risk of the building stock in Slovenia|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">For rational decision-making regarding the strengthening of seismic resilience of the built environment, it is necessary to provide unbiased information about seismic risk, which cannot be achieved through experience due to the low frequency of major earthquakes. For this purpose, we perform two types of physics-based seismic risk analyses of the building stock in Slovenia. Time-based analysis enables the assessment of the average consequences of all possible earthquakes in the selected time interval, which form the basis for planning community seismic resilience. Scenario-based risk analysis evaluates the consequences of an earthquake event defined by earthquake magnitude and epicentre. The latter information is easier to understand and can also be useful for the emergency response units. Both analyses use a stochastic seismic fragility model of the building stock that accounts for uncertainties due to limited knowledge about buildings. The results of the time-based risk analysis indicate that the building stock most likely contains between 31 thousand and 168 thousand buildings or building parts that have a higher than 1% probability of exceeding the full damage state in 50 years, which could be the limit value for acceptable long-term risk. Based on the seismic risk analysis for the earthquake scenario defined by magnitude 6.1 and the epicentre 5 km north of the centre of Ljubljana, and taking into account the assumptions of the seismic risk model, we determined that the number of fatalities due to the considered earthquake would probably be between 57 and 1208. As the seismic risk in the Republic of Slovenia is too high, we proposed various measures for enhancing community seismic resilience</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Za racionalno odločanje glede krepitve potresne odpornosti grajenega okolja je treba zagotoviti nepristranske informacije o potresnem tveganju, ki jih zaradi nizke frekventnosti močnih potresov ni mogoče vzpostaviti z izkušnjami. V ta namen izvedemo fizikalno osnovani analizi potresnega tveganja stavbnega fonda v Sloveniji. S časovno opredeljeno analizo potresnega tveganja ocenimo povprečne posledice vseh možnih potresov v izbranem časovnem intervalu, kar je osnova za načrtovanje krepitve potresne odpornosti skupnosti. Z analizo tveganja na osnovi potresnega scenarija pa se ovrednotijo posledice potresnega dogodka, določenega z magnitudo in epicentrom potresa. Te informacije so lažje razumljive in so lahko koristne tudi na področju civilne zaščite. V obeh analizah uporabimo stohastičen model potresne ranljivosti stavbnega fonda, ki upošteva negotovosti zaradi omejenega poznavanja stavb. Rezultati časovno opredeljene analize tveganja kažejo, da je v stavbnem fondu od 31 tisoč do 168 tisoč stavb oz. delov stavb, za katere je verjetnost prekoračitve stanja popolne poškodovanosti v 50 letih višja od 1 %, kar bi lahko predstavljalo mejno vrednost dolgoročno sprejemljivega tveganja. Z analizo potresnega tveganja na osnovi potresnega scenarija, ki jo izvedemo za potresni scenarij, definiran z magnitudo 6,1 in epicentrom 5 km severno od centra Ljubljane, ter ob upoštevanju predpostavk modela potresnega tveganja smo ugotovili, da bi število smrtnih žrtev zaradi izbranega potresa zelo verjetno znašalo med 57 in 1208. Ker je potresno tveganje v Republiki Sloveniji previsoko, smo predlagali različne ukrepe za krepitev potresne odpornosti skupnosti</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-R5IVLJAN"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-R5IVLJAN" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-R5IVLJAN/9d9474d1-acf2-4a91-8d3e-d17475639fe8/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Zveza društev gradbenih inženirjev in tehnikov Slovenije</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-R5IVLJAN/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-R5IVLJAN" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>