{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-QJHKHRAN/79b3da13-9943-44f2-9253-b3f7456f01bc/PDF","dcterms:extent":"397 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-QJHKHRAN/22c0ace8-0ba7-4e16-89a3-ebb28a995601/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"0 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2001-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2001"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-QJHKHRAN","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-HQCGQAIH"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Monitor ISH"}],"dcterms:issued":"2022","dc:creator":"Gershteyn, Vadim","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:2"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:24"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 37-55"}],"dc:identifier":["COBISSID:151860483","ISSN:1580-688X","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-QJHKHRAN"],"dc:language":"en","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Alma Mater Europaea-Institutum Studiorum Humanitatis, Fakulteta za podiplomski humanistični študij"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"American philosophy"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"American pragmatism"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"cosmology"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"epistemologija"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"epistemology"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"filozofija"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"kozmologija"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"neo-pragmatism"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"ontology"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Peirce"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Peirce, Charles S."},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"pragmatism"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"pragmatizem"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2001-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"No pragmatism without realism| thoughts on the popular scholarly exclusion of Charles S. Peirce|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Pragmatism belongs among the major intellectual schools in philosophy and is also one of the newest. Despite its relative popularity, pragmatism is difficult to define, and various definitions of pragmatism by scholars are contentious. One reason for the confusion over the meaning of pragmatism is the exclusion of its spiritual founder, the American scientist and philosopher Charles S. Peirce, from its most relevant contemporary discussions (especially in terms of the primacy of neo-pragmatism). Peirce has been excluded from the discussion of contemporary pragmatism in part because his fundamental ideas conflict with the contemporary philosophical beliefs of (neo-) pragmatism. A re-contextualization of Peirce’s ideas points to a way of reinterpreting contemporary (neo-)pragmatism in the context of Scholastic realism: a more ancient philosophical school that Peirce was influenced by through his exposure to Duns Scotus. This paper draws on contemporary discussions in pragmatism to find a way in which Peirce’s philosophy might inform current and future philosophical discussions"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Pragmatizem je ena izmed najnovejših velikih filozofskih šol. Kljub relativni priljubljenosti je pragmatizem težko definirati, različne znanstvene definicije pragmatizma pa so sporne. Eden od razlogov za zmedo o pomenu pragmatizma je izključitev njegovega duhovnega utemeljitelja, ameriškega znanstvenika in filozofa Charlesa S. Peircea, iz najbolj relevantnih sodobnih razprav (zlasti v smislu primata neopragmatizma). Peirce je bil delno izključen iz razprave o sodobnem pragmatizmu, ker so njegove temeljne ideje v nasprotju s sodobnimi filozofskimi prepričanji (neo)pragmatizma. Rekontekstualizacija Peirceovih idej kaže na način za reinterpretacijo sodobnega (neo)pragmatizma v kontekstu sholastičnega realizma: starejše filozofske šole, ki je na Piercea vplivala predvsem preko Duns Skota. Ta prispevek se opira na sodobne razprave o pragmatizmu, da bi našel način, kako bi lahko Peirceova filozofija oplajala sedanje in prihodnje filozofske razprave"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-QJHKHRAN","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-QJHKHRAN"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-QJHKHRAN/79b3da13-9943-44f2-9253-b3f7456f01bc/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Institutum Studiorum Humanitatis - Fakulteta za podiplomski humanistični študij"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-QJHKHRAN/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-QJHKHRAN"}}}}