{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-QJ90I6TS/0afc72a1-1610-49b3-be0e-5491751fc8d1/PDF","dcterms:extent":"872 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-QJ90I6TS/32ac55bf-c41b-4459-b69c-79bdc9ef2b9d/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"0 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"1965-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"1965"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-QJ90I6TS","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-ETPSIC7M"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Teorija in praksa"}],"dcterms:issued":"2020","dc:creator":"Lovec, Marko","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:4"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:57"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 1086-1104, 1185"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0040-3598","COBISSID_HOST:48131331","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-QJ90I6TS"],"dc:language":"en","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Visoka šola za politične vede"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Covid-19"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Crises"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Economic policy"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Ekonomska politika"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Epidemics"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Epidemije"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"evropska integracija"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Evropska unija"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Integracijski procesi"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Krize"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Process of integration"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"protikrizni ukrepi"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"velike teorije"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"1965-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Pandemic as a litmus test for the grand theories of European integration|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Several crises over the past decade have shown the inability of the European integration to reconcile the dysfunctionalities associated with the partial transfer of authorities to the transnational level and attracted criticism of the alleged pro-integration bias of the grand theories neofunctionalism, liberal governmentalism and postfunctionalism. This article takes as a case study the Covid-19 pandemic as a \"moment of truth\" that shares many aspects with past crises. It argues that, by addressing various dimensions of the demand for and supply of the integration, the three liberal institutional theories explain the nationalist response to the health crisis (missing demand and supply) and the integrationist decision on economic recovery (sufficient demand and supply). Moreover, they do this better than the nationalist or federalist approaches that either understate the demand for (the former) or overstate the supply of the integration (the latter)"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Številne krize so v preteklem desetletju pokazale na nezmožnost evropskih integracij, da naslovijo disfunkcionalnosti, povezane z delnim prenosom oblasti na transnacionalno raven, ter spodbudile kritiko domnevne integracijske pristranskosti velikih teorije integracij % neofunkcionalizma, liberalne medvladne teorije ter postfunkcionalizma. V analizi jemlje ta članek kot študijo primera pandemijo covida-19 kot \"trenutek resnice\" za integracijo, ki deli številne skupne značilnosti preteklih kriz. Iz analize sledi, da z naslavljanjem različnih ravni povpraševanja in ponudbe integracije tri liberalne institucionalne teorije razlagajo nacionalistični odgovor v zdravstveni krizi (pomanjkanje povpraševanja in ponudbe) ter povezovalno odločitev o gospodarski obnovi (zadostno povpraševanje in ponudba). Še več, izpostavljen je argument, da to počno omenjene teorije bolje od nacionalističnih ali federativnih pristopov, ki podcenjujejo bodisi povpraševanje (prvi) ali ponudbo integracije (drugi)"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-QJ90I6TS","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-QJ90I6TS"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-QJ90I6TS/0afc72a1-1610-49b3-be0e-5491751fc8d1/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-QJ90I6TS/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-QJ90I6TS"}}}}