327 KB253 KB46 KB201320242024Spruk, Jureštevilka:1/2letnik:79str. 69-85, 97-98ISSN:0032-6976COBISSID_HOST:187711235URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-Q7J4Y893slZveza društev pravnikov SlovenijePravnikMontesquieujeva podoba sodnika v luči doktrine delitve oblasti|The author discusses Montesquieu’s image of the judge, an iconic figure in legal theory and legal philosophy, in light of his doctrine of the separation of powers as presented in The Spirit of the Laws. Montesquieu’s discussion appears somewhat incoherent: he sees law as an important social apparatus, yet simultaneously rejects a stable judicial institution to adapt the legal system to a given social reality. He even defines the separation of judicial power from executive power as a criterion for determining moderate regimes, yet perceives judicial power as void. This incoherence arises from the epistemology of natural law, which rejects creativity in favour of discovery of laws. Montesquieu’s image of the judge fits perfectly with the 19th century ideology of codification, which idealises the completeness and clarity of a code of laws. Montesquieu’s rigidly constructed doctrine of separation of powers can justify his anaemic judge only outside the real circumstances of judicial decision-making, for law is created by a judge, not discoveredAvtor obravnava Montesquieujevo podobo sodnika, ki ima v zgodovini teorije in filozofije prava ikoničen status, skozi doktrino delitve oblasti, kot jo Montesquieu predstavi v razpravi Duh zakonov. Montesquieujeva razprava mestoma deluje neskladno, pravu pripisuje pomembno družbeno vlogo, vendar zavrača stalno sodno telo, ki bi pravni red prilagajalo družbeni stvarnosti. Ločitev sodne od izvršilne oblasti določi kot kriterij zmernosti režima, toda zanj je sodna oblast nična. Ta neskladnost izvira iz naravnopravne epistemologije, ki zavrača ustvarjalnost in slavi odkrivanje zakonov. Montesquieujeva podoba sodnika pride še bolj do izraza v kodifikacijski ideologiji 19. stoletja, v kateri prevladajo ideali popolnosti in jasnosti kodeksa. Togo postavljena doktrina delitve oblasti lahko Montesquieujevega anemičnega sodnika upraviči le zunaj dejanskih okoliščin sodniškega odločanja, saj sodnik prava dejansko ne odkriva (dedukcija), temveč ga ustvarja (interpretacija)TEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Pravna fakulteta