488 KB34 KB194820252022Tonin, Gašperštevilka:4letnik:70str. 627-639ISSN:0350-6894DOI:10.57589/srl.v70i4.4087COBISSID_HOST:136567555URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-PZ3QB0QRslSlavistično društvo SlovenijeSlavistična revijaDictionary of the Slovenian standard language (2nd edition)Slovar slovenskega knjižnega jezika (2.0)SloveneSlovene medical dictionarySlovenski medicinski slovarslovenščinaspecialized lexisspecializirana leksikaterminological qualifierterminologijaterminologyterminološki kvalifikatorAnaliza znotraj medicine neustaljenega specializiranega izrazja v splošnorazlagalnem slovarju|This article focuses on the specialized lexical items that appear with the terminological qualifier med. in the Slovar slovenskega knjižnega jezika (Dictionary of the Slovenian standard language 2.0, SSKJ2) but have no terminological parallels in the Slovenski medicinski slovar (Slovene medical dictionary, SMS). The SSKJ2 is supposed to indicate, by means of terminological qualifiers, the specialized field in which “a term lives” or “from which it passes into general use.” We analyzed why a portion of specialized lexical items (331 dictionary entries) was included in the SSKJ2 even though the terms included are not established in the field of medicineV prispevku smo se osredotočili na specializirano leksiko, ki se je pojavila ob terminološkem kvalifikatorju med. v Slovarju slovenskega knjižnega jezika 2.0 (SSKJ2), v Slovenskem medicinskem slovarju (SMS) pa njene terminološke vzporednice oz. ustreznega strokovnega izraza ni. SSKJ2 naj bi namreč s terminološkimi kvalifikatorji nakazal področje, na katerem »termin živi« ali »s katerega prehaja v splošno rabo«. Analizirali smo, zakaj je bil delež specializirane leksike (331 gesel) vključen v SSKJ2, čeprav v medicini ni ustaljenTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaSlavistično društvo Slovenije