224 KB74 KB200920262014Cepec, Jakaletnik:14številka:4str. 399-426ISSN:1580-6316COBISSID:3934920URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-PUFJPSFZslInštitut za delo, Pravna fakultetaDelavci in delodajalciinsolventnostprisilna poravnavaterjatveupnikizaposleniPoložaj terjatev delavcev v insolvenčnih postopkih| pravno-ekonomska in primerjalno-pravna analiza|The article presents a law and economics and comparative analysis of workers' claims in insolvency proceedings. In the context of law and economics analysis the author points out that the priority position of worker's claims in insolvency proceedings represent a redistribution of preinsolvency entitlements which is contrary to the position of the important part of law and economics theory. The author is potentially in favor of exceptions to the general rule of prohibiting redistributional effect of insolvency law in cases where creditors cannot successfully diversify their risk and in cases of involuntary creditors. Comparative legal analysis shows that in all compared legal systems workers' claims have a preferential position as they are considered as priority claims or as costs of the procedure. The differences between compared systems are essentially within the scope of workers claims (in time and in absolute terms) that have a special (priority) statusPrispevek predstavlja pravno - ekonomsko in primerjalno - pravno analizo položaja terjatev delavcev v insolvenčnih postopkih. Avtor pri tem v okviru pravno - ekonomske analize poudarja, da poseben položaj terjatev delavcev v insolvenčnem postopku predstavlja redistribucijo predinsolvenčnih upravičenj, ki ji sorazmerno velik del pravno - ekonomske teorije načeloma nasprotuje, avtor pa zagovarja tezo, da so izjeme od prepovedi redistribucije v določenih primerih pogojno dopustne, in sicer takrat, kadar gre za upnike, ki bodisi ne morejo razpršiti svojega tveganja, in v primerih neprostovoljnih upnikov. V okviru primerjalno pravne analize avtor ugotavlja, da vsi analizirani pravni redi terjatve delavce obravnavajo prednostno, bodisi kot prednostne terjatve bodisi kot stroške postopka. Razlike med ureditvami nastanejo predvsem v obsegu terjatev (časovno in v absolutnem znesku), ki jim pravo priznava poseben status oziroma prednostTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaInštitut za delo pri Pravni fakulteti Univerze v Ljubljani