<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-P1DFL60O/4b6a7245-91d9-46d0-8f1a-d8ccd16def17/PDF"><dcterms:extent>1018 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-P1DFL60O/ab848901-4ac9-4fb1-9d25-2e4cb2758004/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>59 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1965-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1965</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-P1DFL60O"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-ETPSIC7M" /><dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Lekić, Davor</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lesjak, Gregor</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:1</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:50</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 154-171, 263</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0040-3598</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:0040-3598</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:31868509</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Fakulteta za sociologijo, politične vede in novinarstvo v Ljubljani</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Teorija in praksa</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Država in cerkev</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Legal status</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Pravni položaj</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Religious communities</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Slovenia</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Slovenija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">State and church</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Verske skupnosti</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1965-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Država in verske skupnosti| kronika odnosov med letoma 2008 in 2011|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">The article documents and summarises events marking relations between the state and religious communities in Slovenia from 2008 to 2011. In so doing, it focuses on the perspective of the state. Chosen indicators of the quality of these relations include separate reviews of the actual position of religious communities, the actions and procedures of state institutions and amendments to the main legislation on religion. These materials enable us to distinguish two competing positions. Starting from socially and legally defined egalitarianism in socialist Yugoslavia, the position of exclusivism advocates a differentiation between particular religious communities and between all religious communities and all other social groups and practices. Its main goal is to define differences and special features that give rise to particular privileges. The position of inclusivism, on the contrary, places religious communities in line with other social groups and practices, but so as to protect their common characteristics, which are included in the human right of freedom of religion, belief and consciousness. Although the former position should be considered as traditional in Slovenia, the latter one is still dominant because its advocates managed to rewrite the main law on religion in 2007</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Besedilo povzema in dokumentira odnose med državo in verskimi skupnostmi v Sloveniji med letoma 2008 in 2011, in sicer tako, da prvenstveno preizkuša stališča države. Izbrani indikatorji kakovosti odnosov so dejanski položaj verskih skupnosti, praksa državnih organov in temeljni predpis, ki ureja pravni položaj verskih skupnosti. Pregled predhodnega razvoja tega področja sugerira optiko, ki razlikuje med dvema konkurečnima strujama, med inkluzivizmom in ekskluzivizmom. Prvi umešča verske skupnosti med druge družbene skupine in prakse tako, da varuje njihove skupne lastnosti, drugi medverskimi skupnostmi ter le-temi in okoliško družbo zlasti razlikuje in še naprej pomeni uradno doktrino. Inkluzivizem se je v obravnavanem časovnem obdobju izkazal za edino razvito alternativno strategijo urejanja odnosov med državo in verskimi skupnostmi</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-P1DFL60O"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-P1DFL60O" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-P1DFL60O/4b6a7245-91d9-46d0-8f1a-d8ccd16def17/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-P1DFL60O/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-P1DFL60O" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>