<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-OXCFVN12/44dfc223-e6f7-432d-9773-6fa177ac6f67/HTML"><dcterms:extent>50 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-OXCFVN12/68fba59b-16a1-4445-a07b-85b1cf20fcc4/PDF"><dcterms:extent>173 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-OXCFVN12/204ce0e3-72d5-4ec9-8634-8cef100d6335/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>48 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="2003-2012"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">2003</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2012</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-OXCFVN12"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-JEWSRBGK" /><dcterms:issued>2006</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Pevcin, Primož</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:2/3</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:4</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 35-53</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:1581-7555</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:2602926</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-OXCFVN12</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Fakulteta za upravo</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Uprava (Ljubljana)</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">birokracija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">policija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">pritožbe</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">reševanje pritožb</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">uradništvo</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">uslužbenci</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="2003-2012" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Ekonomski vidiki pritožb državljanov na ravnanje uradništva| primer uporabe policijskih prisilnih sredstev|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">There has been a tendency of increased number of citizen complaints against bureaucratic activities in the majority of developed and democratic countries.The main reasons for this tendency are predominantly rising socio-economic inequality in modern societies and the emphasised issue of human rights, which contributes to larger awareness of people when seeking for their rights. In this context, the contemporary conflict theory stresses that bureaucracy is nowadays often seen as an instrument of politically and economically privileged classes through which they exercise social control over marginalised groups of population. Consequently, it is to be expected that this would imply strained relations between bureaucracy and those marginalised social groups. This can be also observed in increased number of citizen complaints against bureaucratic activities, in particular those ones that are impartially seen as unfunded, and are filled primarily to gain some benefit or to avoid responsibility. Besides, strained relations could also affect the confidence in bureaucratic impartiality, thereby causing that citizens see complaints as useless and are averted to fill them. Consequently, these two problems (so-called over- and under-reporting) cause that citizen complaints can be a very poor indicator of the quality of bureaucratic work and ouput for their biasness. Moreover, focusing on citizen complaints as a tool of bureaucratic quality monitoring can be very problematic, since they can be useful tool for measuring bureaucratic productivity and work effort. Namely, if bureaucrats perceive that they are monitored primarily through citizen complaints against their activities, they can be compelled to avoid those complaints by simply reducing their work effort or becoming more prudent as the simplest ways to avoid making mistakes and subsequent complaints. The reduced work effort and growing cautiousness have been found in practice in many bureaucratic activities, in particular in regulatory agencies and police organisations</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-OXCFVN12"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-OXCFVN12" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-OXCFVN12/68fba59b-16a1-4445-a07b-85b1cf20fcc4/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za upravo</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-OXCFVN12/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-OXCFVN12" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>