<Record><identifier xmlns="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">URN:NBN:SI:doc-OOMJM5XO</identifier><date>2018</date><creator>Skalko, John</creator><relation>documents/doc/O/URN_NBN_SI_doc-OOMJM5XO_001.pdf</relation><relation>documents/doc/O/URN_NBN_SI_doc-OOMJM5XO_001.txt</relation><format format_type="issue">1</format><format format_type="volume">78</format><format format_type="type">article</format><format format_type="extent">str. 67-77</format><identifier identifier_type="ISSN">0006-5722</identifier><identifier identifier_type="COBISSID_HOST">7874650</identifier><identifier identifier_type="URN">URN:NBN:SI:doc-OOMJM5XO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Teološka fakulteta</publisher><source>Bogoslovni vestnik</source><rights>InC</rights><subject language_type_id="eng">deception</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">definition of lying</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">Grotian qualifier</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">Grotius, Hugo</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">Grotiusov kvalifikator</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">laganje</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">lying</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">opredelitev laži</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">zmota</subject><title>a reply to Vincelette</title><title>Why the revised Grotian definition of lying still fails</title></Record>