<Record><identifier xmlns="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">URN:NBN:SI:doc-OFNCH6E8</identifier><date>2023</date><creator>Kirsberg, Igor W.</creator><relation>documents/doc/O/URN_NBN_SI_doc-OFNCH6E8_001.pdf</relation><relation>documents/doc/O/URN_NBN_SI_doc-OFNCH6E8_001.txt</relation><format format_type="issue">124/125</format><format format_type="volume">32</format><format format_type="type">article</format><format format_type="extent">str. 203-220</format><identifier identifier_type="DOI">10.32022/PHI32.2023.124-125.9</identifier><identifier identifier_type="ISSN">1318-3362</identifier><identifier identifier_type="COBISSID_HOST">162074883</identifier><identifier identifier_type="URN">URN:NBN:SI:doc-OFNCH6E8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher publisher_location="Ljubljana">Inštitut Nove revije - Zavod za humanistiko</publisher><source>Phainomena (Ljubljana)</source><rights>BY</rights><subject language_type_id="slv">causality</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">difference between thought and feeling</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">fenomenologija</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">kavzalnost</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">phenomenology</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">razlika med mislijo in občutjem</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">science</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">znanost</subject><title>a corrective to Edmund Husserl’s idea</title><title>Is causality admissible in phenomenology?</title></Record>