197 KB58 KB199420242017Čeferin, RokMilosavljevič, MarkoPoler Kovačič, Melitaletnik:24str. S47-S63številka:supl.DOI:10.1080/13183222.2017.1411568ISSN:1318-3222COBISSID:35366749URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-NU592HCAslEvropski inštitut za komuniciranje in kulturoJavnost (Ljubljana)novinarjinovinarstvopravna ureditevprekarno delosamozaposlovanjesvoboda izražanjaPrekarno delo novinarjev kot grožnja svobodi izražanja| odgovornost državnih oblasti|The increase of flexible forms of employment relations is noticed in the Slovenian journalism. Frequently these forms are also precarious, which has or can have negative consequences for the quality of journalistic contents and imperils the watch-dog role of news media. The authors of this research paper substantiate the thesis that state authorities are responsible for the unclear legal position and generally unregulated precarious situation of journalists, which places pressure on journalists and as such represents a threat to freedom of expression. Analysis of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia confirmed that state authorities must actively ensure conditions for the work of free media. If the state in its legislation permits precarious work of journalists, it breaches its positive obligations regarding the protection of freedom of expression, as it enables political and economic power to put journalists in a dependent position. Analysis of key documents showed that in Slovenia since 2002 different institutions (particularly journalistic organisations) have regularly called for improved regulation of the conditions. The state authorities have been acquainted with the issue and with the proposals for changing legislation, yet they have not regulated the problem of precarity in any aspectPorast fleksibilnih oblik zaposlitvenih razmerij je zaznati tudi v slovenskem novinarstvu. Te oblike so pogosto tudi prekarne, kar (lahko) ima negativne posledice za kakovost novinarskih vsebin in ogroža vlogo novičarskih medijev kot nadzornikov oblasti. Avtorji prispevka utemeljujemo tezo, da so za pravno neurejen prekarni položaj novinarjev, ki omogoča pritiske na novinarje in pomeni grožnjo svobodi izražanja, odgovorne državne oblasti. Analiza primerov iz sodne prakse Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice in Ustavnega sodišča Republike Slovenije je potrdila, da morajo državne oblasti aktivno zagotavljati pogoje za delo svobodnih medijev. Če država v zakonodaji dopusti prekarno delo novinarjev, krši svoje pozitivne obveznosti v zvezi z varstvom svobode izražanja, saj politiki in kapitalu omogoči, da novinarje postavlja v odvisen položaj. Analiza ključnih dokumentov je pokazala, da so v Sloveniji po letu 2002 zlasti novinarske organizacije redno pozivale k ureditvi razmer. Državne oblasti so bile s problematiko prekarnega dela ter s predlogi sprememb in dopolnitev zakonodaje seznanjene oziroma pozvane k ukrepanju, vendar problema prekarnosti sistemsko še niso uredileTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaEvropski inštitut za komuniciranje in kulturo - EURICOM