{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-NTPRVVQO/4a03c817-5064-49d6-881e-c1710824f757/PDF","dcterms:extent":"22277 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-NTPRVVQO/386d1f1e-4c75-4f7d-a069-8331e639338a/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"0 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"1973-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"1973"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-NTPRVVQO","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-KHWREVIC"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Geodetski vestnik"}],"dcterms:issued":"2024","dc:creator":["Bratož-Ježek, Branko","Triglav Čekada, Mihaela"],"dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:1"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:68"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 11-39"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0351-0271","DOI:10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2024.01.11-39","COBISSID_HOST:191405315","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-NTPRVVQO"],"dc:language":["en","sl"],"dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Zveza geodetov Slovenije"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"agrarian community"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"agrarne skupnosti"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"cave"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"dolina Glinščice"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Franciscan land cadastre survey"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"franciscejska katastrska izmera"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"jama"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"katastrski mejnik"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"land cadastral boundary marks"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Rosandra valley"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Socerb"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Socerb Castle"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"1973-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Mejna jama in drugi zanimivi katastrski mejniki okoli Socerba in doline Glinščice| Boundary cave and other land cadastral boundary marks around Socerb castle and the Rosandra valley|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"In this paper we will describe the former boundaries of the cadastral municipalities in the Slovenian-Italian cross-border area between the Socerb castle and the Rosandra valley. Today, the villages of Socerb and Beka are located on the Slovenian side of the border, and Mačkolje (Caresana), Prebeneg (Prebenico), Dolina (San Dorlingo della Valle), Boljunec (Bagnoli della Rosandra), Kroglje (Crogole), Gornji Konec (Bagnoli Superiore) and Botač (Bottazzo) on the Italian side. At the time of the Franciscan cadastral survey in this area (from 1818 to 1822), i.e., at the time of the Austrian Empire, these villages, except for Mačkolje, belonged to the district of Fünfenberg, which was part of the province of Istria. Therefore, the same type of cadastral municipality boundary marks from the Franciscan or a revised cadastral survey can be found here as elsewhere in the present-day territory of Slovenia. In addition to the twelve boundary stones with inscriptions, we will also present two natural boundary marks: inscriptions carved on the entrance walls of a cave and inscriptions carved on the smooth rock wall. We will also show that the boundary stones in the Primorska region, which have the same shape as the former cadastral municipality boundary stones, could also have once marked former common lands of agrarian communities, here called jusi, and these were not always the same as the cadastral municipality boundaries"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"V prispevku bomo opisali nekdanje mejnike katastrskih občin na čezmejnem območju med Socerbom in dolino Glinščice. Danes so tod na slovenski strani državne meje vasi Socerb in Beka, na italijanski pa Mačkolje, Prebeneg, Dolina, Boljunec, Kroglje, Gornji Konec in Botač. V času franciscejske katastrske izmere, torej v času Avstrijskega cesarstva, so te vasi, razen Mačkolj, sodile v skupni okraj Robida (Fünfenberg), ki je bil del istrskega okrožja. Zato tod lahko najdemo enake stare mejnike katastrskih občin iz časa franciscejske in remabulančne katastrske izmere kot drugod na današnjem območju Slovenije. Poleg dvanajstih klesanih mejnikov bomo predstavili še dva izjemna primerka naravnih mejnikov: napise, vklesane na vhodne stene jame, in napise, vklesane na gladko kamnito steno. Pokazali pa bomo tudi, da so lahko mejniki, ki imajo enako obliko kot nekdanji mejniki katastrskih občin, nekoč na Primorskem označevali tudi skupne posesti agrarnih skupnosti, ki so jih imenovali jusi, in te niso vedno sovpadale z mejami katastrskih občin"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-NTPRVVQO","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-NTPRVVQO"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-NTPRVVQO/4a03c817-5064-49d6-881e-c1710824f757/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Zveza geodetov Slovenije"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-NTPRVVQO/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-NTPRVVQO"}}}}