{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-NEVHOHXO/739a18d7-eedf-447c-a032-723df8c71ed3/PDF","dcterms:extent":"417 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-NEVHOHXO/5656f059-e597-405b-8314-34328acf1c1f/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"0 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"1965-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"1965"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-NEVHOHXO","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-ETPSIC7M"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Teorija in praksa"}],"dcterms:issued":"2025","dc:creator":"Ellerman, David P.","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:3"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:62"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 641-655"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0040-3598","DOI:10.51936/tip.62.3.641","COBISSID_HOST:255467779","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-NEVHOHXO"],"dc:language":"en","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Fakulteta za družbene vede"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"contestation"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"critical thinking"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"devil’s advocacy"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"groupthink"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"hudičevo zagovorništvo"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"institucionalizirana opozicija"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"izpodbijanje"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"kritično razmišljanje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"loyal opposition"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Organizacijska klima"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Organizacijsko vedenje"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"skupinsko razmišljanje"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"1965-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Devil’s advocacy within organisations|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"A conceptual study that calls for ‘devil’s advocacy’ to be integrated into organisations is presented. The intellectual history of this concept dates back to Socratic thought and the Athenian tradition of intellectual contestation, contrasting it with societies that prioritised harmony over debate. It is argued in the article that institutionalised opposition, like legal adversarial systems or loyal oppositions in politics, can lead to better decision-making and prevent the abuse of power. In contrast to the authoritarian tendencies in the world today, an organisational culture that embraces critical thinking and diverse viewpoints is regarded as essential for progress, mirroring the principles of intellectual liberty shown in historical movements like the Reformation and Enlightenment. The appendix contains a shortened 1998 unpublished internal World Bank document explicitly labelled as an exercise in devil’s advocacy"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"To je konceptualna študija, ki zagovarja integracijo »hudičevega zagovorništva« znotraj organizacij. Intelektualna zgodovina tega koncepta sega nazaj v Sokratovo misel in atensko tradicijo intelektualnega izpodbijanja, ki jo primerja z družbami, ki dajejo prednost harmoniji pred razpravo. Članek trdi, da lahko institucionalizirana opozicija, kot so pravni kontradiktorni sistemi ali politično lojalne opozicije, privede do boljšega odločanja in prepreči zlorabo moči. V nasprotju z avtoritarnimi težnjami v današnjem svetu besedilo zagovarja organizacijsko kulturo, ki sprejema kritično razmišljanje in različna stališča kot bistvena za napredek, kar odraža načela intelektualne svobode, ki jih vidimo v zgodovinskih gibanjih, kot sta reformacija in razsvetljenstvo. Dodatek prinaša skrajšani neobjavljeni interni dokument Svetovne banke iz leta 1998, ki je izrecno označen kot vaja »hudičevega zagovorništva«"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-NEVHOHXO","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-NEVHOHXO"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-NEVHOHXO/739a18d7-eedf-447c-a032-723df8c71ed3/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-NEVHOHXO/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-NEVHOHXO"}}}}