<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-NEVHOHXO/739a18d7-eedf-447c-a032-723df8c71ed3/PDF"><dcterms:extent>417 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-NEVHOHXO/5656f059-e597-405b-8314-34328acf1c1f/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>0 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1965-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1965</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-NEVHOHXO"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-ETPSIC7M" /><dcterms:issued>2025</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Ellerman, David P.</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:3</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:62</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 641-655</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0040-3598</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI:10.51936/tip.62.3.641</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID_HOST:255467779</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-NEVHOHXO</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Fakulteta za družbene vede</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Teorija in praksa</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">contestation</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">critical thinking</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">devil’s advocacy</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">groupthink</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">hudičevo zagovorništvo</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">institucionalizirana opozicija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">izpodbijanje</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">kritično razmišljanje</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">loyal opposition</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Organizacijska klima</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Organizacijsko vedenje</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">skupinsko razmišljanje</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1965-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Devil’s advocacy within organisations|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">A conceptual study that calls for ‘devil’s advocacy’ to be integrated into organisations is presented. The intellectual history of this concept dates back to Socratic thought and the Athenian tradition of intellectual contestation, contrasting it with societies that prioritised harmony over debate. It is argued in the article that institutionalised opposition, like legal adversarial systems or loyal oppositions in politics, can lead to better decision-making and prevent the abuse of power. In contrast to the authoritarian tendencies in the world today, an organisational culture that embraces critical thinking and diverse viewpoints is regarded as essential for progress, mirroring the principles of intellectual liberty shown in historical movements like the Reformation and Enlightenment. The appendix contains a shortened 1998 unpublished internal World Bank document explicitly labelled as an exercise in devil’s advocacy</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">To je konceptualna študija, ki zagovarja integracijo »hudičevega zagovorništva« znotraj organizacij. Intelektualna zgodovina tega koncepta sega nazaj v Sokratovo misel in atensko tradicijo intelektualnega izpodbijanja, ki jo primerja z družbami, ki dajejo prednost harmoniji pred razpravo. Članek trdi, da lahko institucionalizirana opozicija, kot so pravni kontradiktorni sistemi ali politično lojalne opozicije, privede do boljšega odločanja in prepreči zlorabo moči. V nasprotju z avtoritarnimi težnjami v današnjem svetu besedilo zagovarja organizacijsko kulturo, ki sprejema kritično razmišljanje in različna stališča kot bistvena za napredek, kar odraža načela intelektualne svobode, ki jih vidimo v zgodovinskih gibanjih, kot sta reformacija in razsvetljenstvo. Dodatek prinaša skrajšani neobjavljeni interni dokument Svetovne banke iz leta 1998, ki je izrecno označen kot vaja »hudičevega zagovorništva«</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-NEVHOHXO"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-NEVHOHXO" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-NEVHOHXO/739a18d7-eedf-447c-a032-723df8c71ed3/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-NEVHOHXO/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-NEVHOHXO" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>