1370 KB66 KB201320242014Ambrož, Matjažletnik:69številka:7/8str. 519-542, 565-566ISSN:0032-6976COBISSID:13940305URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-N9UO1U4XslZveza društev pravnikov SlovenijePravnikcriminal lawkazensko pravokazniva dejanjastorilciPosebna vprašanja sostorilstva|The institution of co-perpetration is mostly discussed within a classical framework of actively committed intentional offences, whereas the scope of possible perpetrators is not limited (delicta communia), such as e.g. murder, fraud, theft, robbery etc. These "classical scenarios" are relatively well elaborated in the literature, whereas the idea of co-perpetration as "functional control over the act" (ger. funktionelle Tatherrschaft) has become very influential in euro-continental scholarly literature as well as in the case-law. There are, however, other types of offences, which hardly fit into this concept, namely ommissive offences, negligent offences, offences, which demand special status of the perpetrator (delicta propria) and offences, which have to be committed manu propria (ger. eigenhandige Delikte). These offences are marked with numerous peculiarities, which demand substantial adaptations of teachings on co-perpetration. The article attempts to reflect the particularities of co-perpetration in cases of these "non-typical" offences, whereas emphasis is given to dilemmas spotted in the recent Slovenian case-lawNajveč razprav o sostorilstvu za izhodišče jemlje storitvena in hkrati naklepna kazniva dejanja, pri katerih krog možnih storilcev ni omejen, kakršna so denimo umor, goljufija, tatvina, rop itd. Ti "klasični scenariji" so v literaturi razmeroma bogato obdelani, pri čemer je v evrokontinentalnem pravnem okolju postala zelo vplivna ideja o sostorilstvu kot funkcionalni oblasti nad dejanjem. Vendar pa obstajajo tudi tipi kaznivih dejanj, ki se v okvir tega koncepta ne pustijo ujeti: opustitvena kazniva dejanja, malomarna kazniva dejanja, posebna kazniva dejanja (delicta propria) in lastnoročna kazniva dejanja. Naštete skupine kaznivih dejanj zaznamujejo posebnosti, ki zahtevajo precejšnje prilagoditve tudi na področju razumevanja sostorilstva. Članek elaborira posebnosti sostorilstva pri teh kaznivih dejanjih, pri čemer poudarek namenja dilemam, ki so se odprle v novejši slovenski sodni praksiTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Pravna fakulteta