<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-N7QID82M/06901d52-6749-4ac6-9f30-98476168d921/PDF"><dcterms:extent>377 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-N7QID82M/5884d5dd-ea22-4639-8181-57491fa5f4de/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>0 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="2010-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">2010</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-N7QID82M"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-PFDPDLU7" /><dcterms:issued>2017</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Čebulj, Janez</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:75/76</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 47-62</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:1408-9653</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:513818232</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-N7QID82M</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Fakulteta za slovenske in mednarodne študije</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Dignitas (Ljubljana)</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">administrative dispute</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">civil procedure</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">commission for the prevention of corruption</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">komisija za preprečevanje korupcije</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">načelno mnenje</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">osebnostne pravice</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">personality rigts</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">pravni postopek</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">principled opinion</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">subsidiarity</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">subsidiarnost</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">upravni spor</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="2010-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">O subsidiarnosti upravno sodnega varstva - primer načelnega mnenja komisije za preprečevanje korupcije|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">The author highlights some of constitutional aspect of application of the subsidiarity rule of administrative dispute in the provision of judicial protection under the second paragraph of article 157 ot the Constitution. It analyzes constitutional issues on the case of the principled opinion of the Commission on the prevention of corruption. His conclusion is that the provision of protection in the proceedings before the courts of general jurisdiction and, consequently, the exclusion of judicial protection in the proceedings before the court in an administrative dispute means that effective judicial protection is not guaranteed against individual acts referred to in the second paragraph of Article 157 of the Constitution, which interfere with personal rights</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">V prispevku avtor opozarja na nekatere ustavnopravna vprašanja uporabe pravila subsidiarnosti upravnega spora pri zagotavljanju sodnega varstva na podlagi drugega odstavka 157. člena Ustave. Ustavnopravna vprašanja analizira na primeru načelnega mnenja Komisija za preprečevanje korupcije. Njegova sklepna ugotovitev je, da očitna neprilagojenost postopka pred sodiščem splošne pristojnosti v tovrstnih sporih na eni strani in v imenu tega postopka odrekanje sodnega varstva v postopku pred sodiščem v upravnem sporu pomeni, da zoper posamične akte iz drugega odstavka 157. člena Ustave, kadar se z njimi posega v osebnostne pravice, ni zagotovljeno učinkovito sodno varstvo. Če sodno varstvo ni učinkovito, je enako, kot da sploh ni zagotovljeno</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-N7QID82M"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-N7QID82M" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-N7QID82M/06901d52-6749-4ac6-9f30-98476168d921/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Fakulteta za slovenske in mednarodne študije v Kranju</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-N7QID82M/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-N7QID82M" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>