<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-N0CZTFKQ/25d88c07-93a2-47ce-98be-8a97eb550493/PDF"><dcterms:extent>3419 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-N0CZTFKQ/d587e1d3-78e2-4b2f-bf4a-2b1ce9d65281/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>161 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="2001-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">2001</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-N0CZTFKQ"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-9Y6L00VO" /><dcterms:issued>2022</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Žepič, Vid</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:1</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:22</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 11-61</dc:format><dc:identifier>DOI:10.32874/SHS.2022-01</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:135737347</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN:1580-8122</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-N0CZTFKQ</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Zgodovinsko društvo dr. Franca Kovačiča</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Studia Historica Slovenica</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">consilium</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">history of criminal law</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">kazensko pravo</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">law faculties</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">legal counsel</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">pravna mnenja</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Pravna zgodovina</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">pravne fakultete</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">reception of Roman law</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">rimsko pravo</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="2001-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Transmissio actorum| pošiljanje sodnih spisov učenim pravnikom s poudarkom na razvoju v avstrijskih dednih deželah|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Transmissio actorum (Aktenversendung) designates a procedural institution of the Roman-Canon criminal as well as civil procedure, which authorised lay judges in the Early Modern Era to send case files to various judicial colleges in the event of insurmountable doubts regarding the application of complex rules of the learned law. As rule, the entire case file was sent to the faculties of law, foreign municipal or regional courts as well as to the higher administrative and judicial authorities. The impartial opinions of the learned jurists may be regarded as a form of formalized expertise in the legal issues. The courts were, according to customary law, principally obliged to follow the instructions of the experts, which regularily took form of a draft judgment. The research evaluates transmissio actorum as a typical institute of reception of Roman law in the European context. Furthermore, it deals with the question whether and in what forms the institute, its predecessors or surrogates existed in the Austrian hereditary lands. The absence of the transmissio actorum should be identified as one of the causes of the delayed and less intense reception of Roman law in this part of the Holy Roman Empire</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Transmissio actorum (Aktenversendung) je bil institut rimsko-kanonskega postopka, ki je laičnim sodnikom v obdobju recepcije rimskega prava dopuščal, da so v primeru nepremostljivih dvomov o uporabi zapletenih pravil učenega prava sodne spise poslali v odločanje pravniškim kolegijem. Mednje so spadali upravno-sodni organi in pravne fakultete. Proces pridobivanja "nepristranskih" mnenj (consilia) pravnih strokovnjakov bi lahko razumeli kot obliko formaliziranega izvedenstva v pravnih vprašanjih. Sodišča so bila konzilijem, ki so neredko preraščali v osnutke sodnih odločb, načeloma zavezana slediti. Razprava prikazuje razvoj in pomen pošiljanja sodnih spisov kot tipičnega instituta recepcije rimskega prava v evropskem kontekstu. Posebej se osredotoča na vprašanje, ali in v kakšnih pojavnih oblikah je bilo pošiljanje sodnih spisov pravnim strokovnjakom prisotno v avstrijskih dednih deželah. Morebiten neobstoj instituta transmissio actorum bi lahko šteli kot enega izmed razlogov zapoznele in manj intenzivne recepcije rimskega prava v tem delu Svetega rimskega cesarstva</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-N0CZTFKQ"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-N0CZTFKQ" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-N0CZTFKQ/25d88c07-93a2-47ce-98be-8a97eb550493/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Zgodovinsko društvo dr. Franca Kovačiča v Mariboru</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-N0CZTFKQ/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-N0CZTFKQ" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>