{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-MC7Z5JIS/286395f0-4eb5-4deb-9335-2fbda9a0f4da/PDF","dcterms:extent":"1184 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-MC7Z5JIS/68f0a3b7-8a76-4284-b2e4-7a24a366edc6/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"54 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2013-2024","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2013"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2024"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-MC7Z5JIS","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-CFT6PFGK"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Pravnik"}],"dcterms:issued":"2014","dc:creator":"Čertanec, Ana","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:3/4"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:69"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 243-265, 287-288"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0032-6976","COBISSID:13728849","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-MC7Z5JIS"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Zveza društev pravnikov Slovenije"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"alternativne oblike"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"potrošniki"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"reševanje"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"spori"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"trade"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"trgovina"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"varstvo potrošnikov"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"vrednost"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2013-2024"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Vrednost spornega predmeta pri alternativnem reševanju potrošniških sporov|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"The proposal of the Act on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes proposes minimum and maximum values of the matter in dispute for access to the alternative dispute resolution entity. While, according to the author, the determination of the maximum value of the matter in dispute is not questionable, problems may occur while trying to determine the lowest value of the matter in dispute. Since the consumer is still able to file an application before the court, where restrictions do not apply, determining the minimum value of the matter in dispute in consumer alternative dispute resolution is not inadmissible, since this does not violate the right to judicial protection. Nevertheless, the author of the paper opposes to such limitation and presents arguments in favor of the idea that for the sake of consumer protection and enforcement of its rights, such regulation is not appropriate, because most violations of consumer rights happen just there - in small values of the matter in dispute. The paper also examines the regulation of other European countries in the field of consumer alternative dispute resolution and tries, using a comparative overview, to underline the argument that the proposed Slovenian regulation does not have justified reasons"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Po predlogu Zakona o alternativnem reševanju potrošniških sporov je za dostop do razsodišča, ki bo razsojalo o potrošniških sporih, predvidena najnižja in najvišja vrednost spornega predmeta. Medtem ko določitev najvišje vrednosti spornega predmeta po mnenju avtorice ni sporna, se težave lahko pojavijo pri določitvi najnižje vrednosti spornega predmeta. Ker ima potrošnik še vedno možnost vložiti zahtevek pred sodiščem, kjer ta omejitev ne velja, določitev najnižje vrednosti spornega predmeta pri alternativnem reševanju potrošniških sporov ni nedopustna, saj s tem ni kršena pravica do sodnega varstva. Kljub temu avtorica v članku taki omejitvi nasprotuje in navaja argumente za trditev, da tovrstna ureditev zaradi varstva potrošnikov in uveljavljanja njihovih pravic ni primerna, saj je kršitev potrošniških pravic največ prav pri manjših vrednostih spornega predmeta. Avtorica v prispevku preuči tudi ureditev drugih evropskih držav na področju alternativnega reševanja potrošniških sporov in tako tudi s primerjalnega stališča utemelji trditev, da za predlagano slovensko ureditev ni tehtnih razlogov"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-MC7Z5JIS","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-MC7Z5JIS"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-MC7Z5JIS/286395f0-4eb5-4deb-9335-2fbda9a0f4da/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Univerza v Ljubljani, Pravna fakulteta"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-MC7Z5JIS/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-MC7Z5JIS"}}}}