{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-L779CAW9/38c27109-2bea-44fd-a6f6-aed22ae37349/PDF","dcterms:extent":"168 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-L779CAW9/4d6f2d30-9ff4-47c4-89a1-e111a92a5ba4/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"63 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2009-2026","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2009"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2026"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-L779CAW9","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-E6A91FTJ"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Delavci in delodajalci"}],"dcterms:issued":"2014","dc:creator":"Mežnar, Špela","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:1"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:letn 14"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 41-65"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:1580-6316","COBISSID:513706360","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-L779CAW9"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Inštitut za delo, Pravna fakulteta"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"časnikarstvo"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"delodajalci"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"novinarji"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"novinarstvo"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"odškodninska odgovornost"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"osebna odgovornost"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"uredniki"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2009-2026"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Odškodninska odgovornost novinarjev in urednikov po 147. členu OZ| dileme v sodni praksi|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"This article focuses on the situation of the direct liability of the employers for damages caused by the staff journalists and editors (employees) for third parties in the course of their work. The position of the Slovenian Supreme Court, according to which staff journalists and editors (employees) are not subject to the privilege of exclusive liability of their employer (media company) for damage caused by ordinary negligence, is neither justified nor theoretically correct. This applies to both arguments, applied by the highest court: first, it is not true that the intent to write an article per se contains the intent to cause damage. Second, Article 6 (and Article 18) of the Media Act do not constitute a lex specialis (as an exception) in relation to 147 Code of Obligation. The author exposes the controversy of the case law according to which such strict rules of direct personal responsibility are being applied for the journalists and editors that exculpation on the grounds of Article 147 of the Code of Obligations is virtually impossible. The article analyses the case law and comments on controversial issues"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Članek se osredotoča na primer neposredne odgovornosti delodajalca za škodo, ki jo povzročijo zaposleni novinarji in odgovorni uredniki pri svojem delu tretjim osebam. Stališče Vrhovnega sodišča, po katerem za zaposlene novinarje in urednike ne velja privilegij izključne od - škodninske odgovornosti delodajalca za škodo, povzročeno iz navadne malomarnosti, po mnenju avtorice ni niti pravnopolitično sprejemljivo niti teoretično pravilno. To velja za oba argumenta, na katera se opira sodna praksa najvišjega sodišča: ni res, da naklep napisati članek vsebuje tudi naklep s člankom povzročiti škodo in ni res, da 6. člen (oziroma 18. člen) ZMed predstavlja lex specialis v razmerju do 147. člena OZ. Avtorica izpo - stavlja spornost takšne sodne prakse, ki za zaposlene novinarje in urednike uvaja tako stroga pravila neposredne osebne odgovornosti, da po njenem mnenju ekskulpacija po 147. členu OZ v primeru navadne malomarnosti praktično ni več mogoča. Avtorica v članku kritično analizira sodno prakso in predstavi svoje mnenje o spornih stališčih"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-L779CAW9","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-L779CAW9"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-L779CAW9/38c27109-2bea-44fd-a6f6-aed22ae37349/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Inštitut za delo pri Pravni fakulteti Univerze v Ljubljani"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-L779CAW9/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-L779CAW9"}}}}