631 KB58 KB201620242017Žuber, Brunaštevilka:1/2letnik:53str. 15-34, 107-108ISSN:1318-2277COBISSID:15707473URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-L722E2HTslGospodarski vestnikInštitut za javno upravoJavna upravaimplementation of adversarial principlekvalificiran delež v zavarovalnicinadzorposebni upravni postopekpravica do izjavepravica do obrazložitvequalifying holding in an insurance undertakingright to be heardright to reasons for the decisionspecial administrative procedureuresničevanje načela kontradiktornostizavarovalniceUresničevanje načela kontradiktornosti v postopku odločanja o izdaji in o odvzemu dovoljenja za pridobitev kvalificiranega deleža v zavarovalnici|One of the tasks of Insurance Supervision Agency, which aims to control corporate governance of insurance undertakings, is to decide on issuing and on withdrawal of the authorization for acquiring qualifying holding in an insurance undertaking. The effects of the Agency%s decision are not limited only to legal implications but also to economic. Therefore, unlawful decision of the Insurance Supervision Agency regarding qualifying holding in an insurance undertaking may cause a difficult to repair damage for companies that are or intend to become qualified holders. All of the above and underlying the fact that the judicial review of decisions of the Insurance Supervision Agency is limited, indicates that the Insurance Supervision Agency in procedures regarding issuing or withdrawing the authorization for acquiring qualifying holding in an insurance undertaking is expected to act diligent from the procedural point of view and in this context to implement the right to be heard in all its dimensionsEna od nalog Agencije za zavarovalni nadzor je odločanje o izdaji in o odvzemu dovoljenja za pridobitev kvalificiranega deleža v zavarovalnici, katere cilj je nadzorovati upravljanje zavarovalnice. Učinki odločb Agencije za zavarovalni nadzor nikakor niso le pravni, temveč tudi ekonomski. Nezakonita odločba Agencije za zavarovalni nadzor glede kvalificiranih deležev zato lahko povzroči težko popravljive škodljive posledice gospodarskim družbam, ki so ali bi želele postati kvalificirani imetniki. Vse to ter dodatno še dejstvo, da je sodni nadzor nad odločbami Agencije za zavarovalni nadzor omejen, kaže na to, da mora Agencija za zavarovalni nadzor v postopkih odločanja o izdaji oziroma o odvzemu dovoljenja za pridobitev kvalificiranega deleža ravnati procesno posebej skrbno in v tem okviru skrbeti tudi za vsestransko uresničevanje pravice do izjaveTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Pravna fakulteta