{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-KTLHKK1G/bfbd1b1d-a9dc-4384-af68-d69ff19e1ca2/PDF","dcterms:extent":"282 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-KTLHKK1G/d5e4300d-91f3-4257-87ab-83b853d8a250/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"74 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"1994-2024","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"1994"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2024"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-KTLHKK1G","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-TQH6JN7K"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Javnost (Ljubljana)"}],"dcterms:issued":"2014","dc:creator":"Nieminen, Hannu","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:21"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:3"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 55-76, 110"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:1318-3222","COBISSID:33131613","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-KTLHKK1G"],"dc:language":"en","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Evropski inštitut za komuniciranje in kulturo"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"človekove pravice"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"democracy"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"demokracija"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Europe"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Evropa"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"human rights"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"intelektualci"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"intelektualna svoboda"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"javnost"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"kritično mišljenje"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q8458"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"1994-2024"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Critical intellectuals, Europe and the small nations| a short history of the epistemic commons|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"The quest for more openness and publicity is seen as a continuation of the long historical development of the epistemic commons, which began in the Middle Ages and culminated in the legacy of the Enlightenment. The argument is that European modernity is fundamentally based on the assumption that knowledge and culture belong to the common domain and that the process of democratisation necessarily means removing restrictions on the epistemic commons. Over the last 30 years, this optimism has suffered from two kinds of backlashes. Firstly, from the 1970s onwards, a policy of weakening and privatising public institutions has practically halted the expansion of the epistemic commons. Secondly, the other half of Europe, the CEE countries, did not benefit from the same kind of democratic development after the Second World War as their Western counterparts did. Because there was no tradition of democratic public institutions, the critical intellectuals in the CEE countries were rather helpless in promoting the ideas of publicity and democratic citizenship. The difficult questions are as follows: What can the role of critical scholars in promoting the epistemic commons be today? How should we understand the legacy of the Enlightenment - without falling for nostalgia for the 1960s and 1970s?"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Prizadevanje za večjo odprtost in obveščanje javnosti se kaže kot nadaljevanje dolgega zgodovinskega razvoja epistemološkega skupnega, ki se je začelo v srednjem veku in doseglo vrh v zapuščini razsvetljenstva. Evropska modernost temelji na predpostavki, da znanje in kultura pripadata skupni domeni in da proces demokratizacije nujno pomeni odpravo omejitev glede epistemološkega skupnega. V zadnjih 30 letih ta optimizem trpi zaradi dveh vrst nazadovanj. Prvič, po letu 1970 je politika slabitve in privatizacije javnih zavodov praktično ustavila širitev epistemološkega skupnega. Drugič, druga polovica Evrope, države srednje in vzhodne Evrope, ni imela koristi od iste vrste demokratičnega razvoja po drugi svetovni vojni kot so jih imeli njihovi zahodni kolegi. Ker ni bilo tradicije demokratičnih državnih institucij, so bili kritični intelektualci v državah srednje in vzhodne Evrope precej nemočni pri uveljavljanju idej javnosti in demokratičnega državljanstva. Zahtevni vprašanji sta: Kakšna je lahko vloga kritičnih znanstvenikov pri spodbujanju epistemološkega skupnega danes? Kako naj razumemo zapuščino razsvetljenstva - brez občutka nostalgije po 60. in 70. leti prejšnjega stoletja?"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-KTLHKK1G","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-KTLHKK1G"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-KTLHKK1G/bfbd1b1d-a9dc-4384-af68-d69ff19e1ca2/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Evropski inštitut za komuniciranje in kulturo - EURICOM"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-KTLHKK1G/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-KTLHKK1G"}}}}