<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-KNHT0LQI/4a077f0e-355b-4884-9e39-77a80942bded/PDF"><dcterms:extent>424 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-KNHT0LQI/26bb141c-af80-44f9-b738-153f5cfe58c1/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>48 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1982-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1982</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-KNHT0LQI"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-T2GYXHDC" /><dcterms:issued>2022</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Dragoš, Srečo</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:4</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:61</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 271-284</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0352-7956</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI:10.51741/sd.2022.61.4.271-284</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID_HOST:136387843</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-KNHT0LQI</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Fakulteta za socialno delo</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Socialno delo</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">ethics</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">etika</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">fascism</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">fašizem</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">functionalism</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">funkcionalizem</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">profesija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">profession</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">sistem</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">social work</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">socialno delo</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">system</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1982-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Prestopanje meja| ob 60-letnici revije Socialno delo|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">After 60 years of publication of the Socialno delo journal (dedicated to social work), we found ourselves in a very unfavorable social environment. When the state and its systems do their job poorly, the quality of life deteriorates for everyone, but first of all for the marginalized groups and strata, because they have the least power. The same applies to the science system, where marginalized professions and institutions are most affected. How to act in such cases in social work, including our journal? A false dilemma that imposes itself (especially) in tough social conditions is in relation to professional standards. Are professions - as special, specialized fields that are within the social division of work clearly distinguished from other activities - only responsible for their own field that is their jurisdiction? Or is it more true that tampering with other systems in the environment is also part of professional responsibility? The article states the reasons for the second option, namely, that crossing the borders, not closing inward, is correct. There are three types of arguments: normative, generic and systemic</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Po 60 letih izhajanja revije Socialno delo smo se znašli v zelo neugodnem družbenem okolju. Ko država in njeni sistemi slabo opravljajo svoje delo, se kakovost življenja poslabšuje vsem, najprej in najbolj pa marginaliziranim skupinam in slojem, ker imajo najmanj moči. Enako velja tudi znotraj sistema znanosti, kjer so najbolj prizadete marginalizirane profesije in ustanove. Kako v takšnih primerih ravnati v socialnem delu, tudi z našo revijo? Napačna dilema, ki se vsiljuje (zlasti) v zaostrenih družbenih razmerah, je v zvezi s profesionalnimi standardi. So profesije - kot posebna, specializirana področja, ki so znotraj družbene delitve dela jasno razločena od drugih dejavnosti - odgovorne le za matično področje, ki je v njihovi pristojnosti? Ali pa je bolj res nasprotno, da je torej poseganje v druge sisteme v okolju tudi del profesionalne odgovornosti? V članku so navedeni razlogi za drugo možnost, torej da je pravilnejše prestopanje meja, ne pa zapiranje navznoter. Gre za tri vrste argumentov: normativne, generične in sistemske</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-KNHT0LQI"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-KNHT0LQI" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-KNHT0LQI/4a077f0e-355b-4884-9e39-77a80942bded/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za socialno delo</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-KNHT0LQI/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-KNHT0LQI" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>