{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-K9WR23KE/9c2c9472-f849-4c9f-9d8c-3621992409d9/PDF","dcterms:extent":"1945 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-K9WR23KE/2907d933-2eb1-454a-84b7-15cf62555027/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"66 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"1965-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"1965"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-K9WR23KE","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-ETPSIC7M"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Teorija in praksa"}],"dcterms:issued":"2015","dc:creator":["Deželan, Tomaž","Krašovec, Alenka"],"dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:52"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:6"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 1167-1190, 1248"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0040-3598","COBISSID:584191","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-K9WR23KE"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Fakulteta za sociologijo, politične vede in novinarstvo v Ljubljani"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"2010-2011"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Deliberative democracy [V4.3]"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"demokratično posvetovanje"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"empirične analize"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"institucionalni dejavniki"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"kontekstualni dejavniki"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"osebnostni dejavniki"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Parlamentarna razprava"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"parlamenti"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Parliamentary debate"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Posvetovalna demokracija [V4.3]"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Slovenia"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Slovenija"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"1965-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Institucionalne in osebnostne določnice demokratične deliberacije| primer slovenskega parlamenta|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"In this article, we analyse selected institutional, contextual and personal variables previously proven to have an effect on the level of democratic deliberation in representative bodies. Selected theoretical propositions were tested on a sample of statements derived from a series of parliamentary debates on the so-called Family Act (Marriage and Family Relations Act) that has divided Slovenian politics and society. Initially, the authors present the current state-of-the-art in the field on the basis of a brief literature review of key determinants affecting parliamentary debates. In the second part of the article, on the basis of empirical scrutiny of the exposed determinants the authors assert that the interplay of institutional and personal determinants impacts the level of democratic deliberation, whereby the personal component has proven to have the most equivocal and theoretically sound effect on democratic deliberation in the Slovenian parliament"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"V članku je analiziran vpliv izbranih institucionalnih kontekstualnih in osebnostnih dejavnikov na stopnjo demokratične deliberacije v parlamentarni razpravi o t. i. Družinskem zakoniku. V prvem delu članka avtorja predstavita analizo obstoječe literature ter argumente, na podlagi katerih bi lahko pričakovali večjo oziroma manjšo stopnjo vpliva analiziranih dejavnikov na stopnjo demokratične deliberacije v izbranem primeru. Na podlagi izvedene analize avtorja ugotovita, da na stopnjo demokratične deliberacije v analiziranem primeru vpliva splet institucionalnih in osebnostnih dejavnikov, pri čemer je moč zaznati izrazito jasen in teoretsko skladen vpliv osebnostnega dejavnika. Po drugi strani, institucionalni dejavniki in strankarski kontekst ne kažejo jasnega vpliva na raven demokratične deliberacije, prav tako pa so ponekod njihovi učinki tudi v nasprotju s teoretskimi predpostavkami"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-K9WR23KE","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-K9WR23KE"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-K9WR23KE/9c2c9472-f849-4c9f-9d8c-3621992409d9/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-K9WR23KE/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-K9WR23KE"}}}}