<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-K9WR23KE/9c2c9472-f849-4c9f-9d8c-3621992409d9/PDF"><dcterms:extent>1945 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-K9WR23KE/2907d933-2eb1-454a-84b7-15cf62555027/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>66 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1965-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1965</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-K9WR23KE"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-ETPSIC7M" /><dcterms:issued>2015</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Deželan, Tomaž</dc:creator><dc:creator>Krašovec, Alenka</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:52</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:6</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 1167-1190, 1248</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0040-3598</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:584191</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-K9WR23KE</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Fakulteta za sociologijo, politične vede in novinarstvo v Ljubljani</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Teorija in praksa</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">2010-2011</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Deliberative democracy [V4.3]</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">demokratično posvetovanje</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">empirične analize</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">institucionalni dejavniki</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">kontekstualni dejavniki</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">osebnostni dejavniki</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Parlamentarna razprava</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">parlamenti</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Parliamentary debate</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Posvetovalna demokracija [V4.3]</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Slovenia</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Slovenija</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1965-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Institucionalne in osebnostne določnice demokratične deliberacije| primer slovenskega parlamenta|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">In this article, we analyse selected institutional, contextual and personal variables previously proven to have an effect on the level of democratic deliberation in representative bodies. Selected theoretical propositions were tested on a sample of statements derived from a series of parliamentary debates on the so-called Family Act (Marriage and Family Relations Act) that has divided Slovenian politics and society. Initially, the authors present the current state-of-the-art in the field on the basis of a brief literature review of key determinants affecting parliamentary debates. In the second part of the article, on the basis of empirical scrutiny of the exposed determinants the authors assert that the interplay of institutional and personal determinants impacts the level of democratic deliberation, whereby the personal component has proven to have the most equivocal and theoretically sound effect on democratic deliberation in the Slovenian parliament</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">V članku je analiziran vpliv izbranih institucionalnih kontekstualnih in osebnostnih dejavnikov na stopnjo demokratične deliberacije v parlamentarni razpravi o t. i. Družinskem zakoniku. V prvem delu članka avtorja predstavita analizo obstoječe literature ter argumente, na podlagi katerih bi lahko pričakovali večjo oziroma manjšo stopnjo vpliva analiziranih dejavnikov na stopnjo demokratične deliberacije v izbranem primeru. Na podlagi izvedene analize avtorja ugotovita, da na stopnjo demokratične deliberacije v analiziranem primeru vpliva splet institucionalnih in osebnostnih dejavnikov, pri čemer je moč zaznati izrazito jasen in teoretsko skladen vpliv osebnostnega dejavnika. Po drugi strani, institucionalni dejavniki in strankarski kontekst ne kažejo jasnega vpliva na raven demokratične deliberacije, prav tako pa so ponekod njihovi učinki tudi v nasprotju s teoretskimi predpostavkami</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-K9WR23KE"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-K9WR23KE" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-K9WR23KE/9c2c9472-f849-4c9f-9d8c-3621992409d9/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-K9WR23KE/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-K9WR23KE" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>