1880 KB82 KB201320242014Keršmanc, Cirilštevilka:1/2letnik:69str. 89-115, 139-140ISSN:0032-6976COBISSID:13616721URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-K8VR8B4FslZveza društev pravnikov SlovenijePravnikgospodarski kriminalkazenski postopekkazniva dejanjakaznovanjeposlovanjeGlosa o interpretacijski diskreciji pri pregonu kaznivega dejanja poslovne goljufije|The serious crime of business fraud as defined in the Slovene Penal code is by far the most frequent serious crime in the chapter of economic crime that Slovenian law enforcement and judiciary have to deal with on a daily basis. The central question this article addresses is how to limit the scope of the legal definition to the more serious cases and thus curb overcriminalization, especially vis-a-vis the so called de minimis cases. After briefly outlining the normative development, the author proceeds to classify various (sub)types of business fraud that he encountered during his extensive fieldwork analysis of raw prosecutorial files. The core of the article focuses on two issues in particular that allow for a degree of interpretative discretion in prosecuting and adjudicating cases of this particular crime. Namely, the degree of qualification and concretization of the deception itself and the problem of ex post facto payments in connection to what role such payments should play in assessing whether business fraud was actually committed and if it is worth prosecuting or notKaznivo dejanje poslovne goljufije je daleč najbolj pogosto kaznivo dejanje s področja gospodarske kriminalitete, s katerim se srečujejo organi odkrivanja, pregona in sojenja. Rdeča nit prispevka je vprašanje, kako je mogoče zamejiti nadaljnje drsenje tega kaznivega dejanja v gospodarsko bagatelo. Po uvodni sumarni predstavitvi (normativnega) razvoja inkriminacije poskusi avtor na podlagi obsežne terenske raziskave razvrstiti zaznane pojavne oblike obravnavanega kaznivega dejanja v (pod)tipe glede na različne stopnje neprava. V osrednjem delu prispevka pa obravnava dva problematična vsebinska sklopa, ki dajeta organom pregona in sojenja na voljo določeno stopnjo interpretacijske diskrecije glede pregona, in sicer vprašanje stopnje kvalifikacije oz. konkretizacije preslepitve ter objektivni pogoj kaznivosti in z njim povezano vprašanje t. i. ex post facto plačilTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Pravna fakulteta