243 KB64 KB199120252014Mlekuž, Jernejštevilka:1letnik:24=75ISSN:0354-0316COBISSID:1747078URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-K7CEZ8OEslSlovenski etnografski muzejEtnolog. Nova vrsta (Ljubljana)Carniolan sausageethnologyetnologijakranjska klobasanarodni simbolinational symbolsSlovenian newspapersslovensko časopisjesocialismsocializemzgodovinski preglediPrelom s staro miselnostjo, da je gost zadovoljen, če dobi kranjsko klobaso in liter vina| semantična kontinuiteta in diskontinuiteta kranjske klobase v socialistični Jugoslaviji|Since its first mention in the Slovene papers in 1849, the Carniolan sausage has shown the kind of symbolic stability, continuity, and endurance that would be hard to find with other material objects identified with Slovenehood or national symbols. But even the Carniolan sausage has not always enjoyed unproblematic continuity of the same content - one that would have been preserved in the same form through time. In particular not when a time comes along that more or less turns everything upside down - a time of revolution. The article explores what happened to the Carniolan sausage in the socialist period that was marked by revolution, i.e. a period when many things which reminded people of previous times were considered unwanted. In spite of the new regime's often negative attitude towards the Carniolan sausage, it partly managed to preserve its symbolic, signifying potential. It continued to be identified, as in the times before the revolution, with Slovenehood and things "smeared" with Slovenehood. But it also started to be identified with past time or "traditions", which the "new times" often preferred to forget about or simply erase, though at times they also indulged in nostalgically sweet memories. The Carniolan sausage has several identification elements, resulting in syncretism and consequently in changes, promotion, and intermixture. The Carniolan sausage thus has not become an outdated identification element, but living, continuous communication, which belongs to several generations, participates in a variety of traditions, and has inherited several legacies. As indicated by the period of the first Yugoslavia, this does not necessarily mean that the result is harmonious or conflictlessKranjska klobasa je od prve znane omembe v slovenskem časopisju leta 1849 pokazala simbolno stabilnost, kontinuiranost in trdnost, ki jo pri drugih materialnih objektih označenih s slovenstvom - narodnih simbolih bržkone ne bi našli. Toda tudi kranjska klobasa ni (bila) neproblematična kontinuiteta iste vsebine, ki bi se v času ohranjala v isti obliki. Še posebej, ko pridejo časi, ki stvari v veliki meri postavijo na glavo - časi revolucije. Prispevek raziskuje, kaj se zgodi s kranjsko klobaso v obdobju socializma, obdobju zaznamovanem z revolucijo, v obdobju, ko je bilo marsikaj, kar je spominjalo na pretekle dobe, nezaželeno. Kranjska klobasa je kljub pogosto negativnemu odnosu novih oblasti v delni meri ohranila simbolni, označevalni potencial. Še vedno je označevala, kot v časih pred revolucijo, slovenstvo in s slovenstvom popackane stvari. Začne pa označevati tudi pretekle čase, "tradicije", kar "novi časi" pogosto želijo pozabiti ali kar izbrisati, a se jih včasih tudi nostalgično sladko spominjajo. Kranjska klobasa ima več identifikacijskih točk, katerih posledica je sinkretičnost in s tem spreminjanje, napredovanje, premešanje. Kranjska klobasa torej ni (bila) zastaran identifikacijski element, temveč živa, neprestana komunikacija, pripada več rodovom, sodeluje v več tradicijah in deduje več zapuščin. Zato nikakor ni nujno, kot je pokazalo tudi obdobje prve Jugoslavije, da se iz tega razvije harmoničen, nekonflikten rezultatTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaSlovenski etnografski muzej