176 KB42 KB196520252016Perger, Ninaletnik:53številka:6str. 1386-1400, 1511ISSN:0040-3598COBISSID:34579037URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-JZTXWTS9enVisoka šola za politične vedeTeorija in praksaHigher educationSeksizemSexismSubjectSubjektVisoko šolstvoSexism| naming a problem, becoming a problem|In this article, we analyse practices of naming sexism based on empirical data. The analysis is based on the concept of a "wilful subject" as discussed by Sara Ahmed. In the analysis, we are particularly interested in the contextual characteristics of naming sexism, that is, when and how does the naming occur, and when is the naming absent. We are also interested in the "backlashes" the one who is naming sexism is confronted with. Those backslashes function as attempts to legitimise already named and problematised sexism by addressing the subject doing the naming as a wilful one or a feminist killjoy. Thus, by naming a problem, the subject who is naming it may themselves become a problemV prispevku na podlagi empiričnih podatkov analiziramo prakse 'imenovanja' seksizma, torej njegovega problematiziranja in naslavljanja, ter odzive na tovrstna delovanja. Pri tem je uporabljen koncept "nemirnega subjekta" (wilful subject), kot ga obravnava Sara Ahmed. V tem okviru nas zanima kontekstualnost imenovanja, tj. v kakšnih kontekstih (in kako) se subjekt izpostavlja in problematizira seksizem in v kakšnih kontekstih tovrstno imenovanje umanjka. Poleg tega se osredotočamo tudi na analizo protiodzivov oziroma poskusov legitimizacije seksizma, ki nastopijo po problematizaciji le-tega. S slednjimi je subjekt, ki imenuje seksizem, skupaj s praksami imenovanja, razvrednoten in pozicioniran kot "nemirni subjekt", ki (feministično) ubija užitek: prek imenovanja problema (seksizma) subjekt sam postane problemTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede