1465 KB72 KB201320242014Rozman, Tilštevilka:5/6letnik:69str. 327-352, 411-412ISSN:0032-6976COBISSID:32771933URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-JZCZOB7KslZveza društev pravnikov SlovenijePravnikpravdni postopektožbeFaza preizkusa sklepčnosti tožbe|In the article the author addresses and briefly describes current legal regulation of the institute of conclusiveness of an action and differs it from the preliminary examination of an action; conclusiveness is not a prerequisite for the completeness of an action. It is found that current legal regulation is suboptimal, especially in one aspect - although the claim is not founded upon the facts stated in the action, the action (which contains all matter set forth in Article 180 of the Civil Procedure Act and in respect of which the due amount of court fee has been paid) shall be served by the court upon the defendant to make a defence plea and the defendant shall be instructed by the court that in the event of his failure to file a defence plea within the determined time limit, or if his defence plea does not contain a statement of grounds, the court will render a default judgment. This question is analysed with regard to the valid and comparative regulatory framework and legal theory. The author concludes with the proposal to amend the Civil Procedure ActAvtor v prispevku obravnava in kratko predstavi veljavno ureditev instituta sklepčnosti tožbe ter ga razlikuje od faze predhodnega preizkusa tožbe; sklepčnost ni pogoj za popolnost tožbe. Avtor ugotavlja neprimernost veljavne ureditve, ki se kaže zlasti v ureditvi položaja toženca, ki mu je vročena nesklepčna tožba - četudi iz dejstev, ki so navedena v tožbi, ne izhaja utemeljenost tožbenega zahtevka, mora sodišče tožbo (ki ima vse sestavine iz 180. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku in za katero je plačana sodna taksa) vročiti toženi stranki, da nanjo odgovori, ter jo pri tem opozoriti, da bo v primeru, da v postavljenem roku ne bo odgovorila na tožbo ali da odgovor na tožbo ne bo obrazložen, izdalo zamudno sodno. Navedeni položaj je obravnavan z vidika veljavne in primerjalnopravne ureditve ter z vidika pravne teorije. V zadnjem delu prispevka avtor predlaga spremembo Zakona o pravdnem postopkuTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Pravna fakulteta