{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-JVUT1M2Q/aa4-c86a6d-09af471f2-6-3d7cdfbdefd40/PDF","dcterms:extent":"250 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-JVUT1M2Q/9f2365d2-635e-40cb-8cb2-81cf60b8889e/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"76 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2013-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2013"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-JVUT1M2Q","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-2XUGOISV"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Podjetje in delo"}],"dcterms:issued":"2023","dc:creator":"Dular, Drago","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:49"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:8"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 1381-1407"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0353-6521","COBISSID:181081347","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-JVUT1M2Q"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Gospodarski vestnik"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Inštitut za delo pri Pravni fakulteti"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Zveza Društev pravnikov v gospodarstvu Slovenije"}],"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"ekonomska škoda"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"naročniki"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"nepogodbena odškodninska odgovornost"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"obligacijska razmerja"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"odškodninska odgovornost"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"pravna relevantna škoda"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"strokovnjaki"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"tretje osebe"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2013-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Nepogodbena odškodninska odgovornost strokovnjakov nasproti tretjim osebam|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"It is customary for professionals working in liberal professions to be liable to their clients for breaches of contracts under which they have been commissioned to provide expert opinions. This does not preclude their liability for damages on a non-contractual basis when they have breached professional law in the preparation of their opinions. In the area of liability of experts to third parties, the above distinctions of liability, with their different purposes, are less to third parties, which is due to the fact that, although the non-contractual liability of experts to third parties is limited to the relationship between experts and third parties, it is at the same time embedded in the matrix of tripartite relations and can be understood on the basis of an analysis of those relationships. This also has an impact on the specific damages to third parties, which is expressed as pure economic damages and is conceptually linked to the characteristic of the third party. Third parties are persons to whom expert opinions are not addressed but who may, under certain conditions, rely on them. In such a context, the presumption of illegality of the experts' conduct becomes crucial to understanding third-party harm. Third parties are characterised by the fact that they can only arise in the context of triangular relationships and third-party damage can also be understood in the context of those relationships. Given that the Slovenian courts, when dealing with third-party damage, have so far referred to the concept of legally relevant damages, which is also derived from European tort law, in relation to damage caused by the provision of false information, the author of this article argues that this concept of damage refers to damage suffered by the contracting entity and not by third parties. The notion of pure economic damage that can be suffered by a third party in the context of tripartite relationships was developed by German, English and, to an extent, Austrian courts, and is now widely established in comparative law. In Slovenian law, in order to establish the damage in question, it would also be necessary to refer to the corresponding legal basis, determined according to the praeter legem criterion"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Za odškodninsko odgovornost strokovnjakov, ki delujejo v samostojnih poklicih, je običajno, da odgovarjajo svojim klientom zaradi kršitev pogodb, s katerimi so prevzeli naročila za izdelavo strokovnih mnenj. S tem pa ni izključena njihova odškodninska odgovornost na nepogodbenem temelju, kadar so pri izdelavi svojih mnenj kršili poklicno zakonodajo. Pri odškodninski odgovornosti strokovnjakov nasproti tretjim osebam postaneta navedeni razmejitvi odškodninske odgovornosti z dvema različnima namenoma odgovornosti manj jasni, kar je posledica dejstva, da je nepogodbena odškodninska odgovornost strokovnjakov nasproti tretjim osebam sicer omejena na razmerja med strokovnjaki in tretjimi osebami, vendar je istočasno vpeta v celotno matrico tristranskih in jo je mogoče razumeti na podlagi analize teh razmerij. To vpliva tudi na specifično škodo tretje osebe, ki se izraža kot čista ekonomska škoda in je pojmovno povezana z značilnostmi tretje osebe. Tretje osebe so osebe, ki jim strokovna mnenja niso bila namenjena, vendar pa se lahko pod določenimi pogoji nanje sklicujejo. V takšnem kontekstu postane predpostavka o protipravnosti ravnanj strokovnjakov ključna za razumevanje škode tretjih oseb. Za tretje osebe je značilno, da se lahko pojavijo izključno v okviru tristranskih razmerij, pri čemer je tudi škodo tretjih oseb mogoče razumeti v kontekstu teh razmerij. Glede na to, da so se slovenska sodišča pri obravnavanju škode tretjih oseb do sedaj sklicevala na pojem pravno relevantne škode, ki izhaja tudi iz evropskega odškodninskega prava, v povezavi z odškodninsko odgovornostjo strokovnjakov za škodo, ki nastane zaradi posredovanja napačnih informacij, avtor članka dokazuje, da se navedeni pojem škode nanaša na škodo, ki jo utrpijo naročniki informacij, in ne tretje osebe. Pojem čiste ekonomske škode, ki jo lahko utrpi tretja oseba v kontekstu tristranskih razmerij, so izoblikovala nemška in angleška ter delno tudi avstrijska sodišča, v sedanjem času pa je ta pojem škode v primerjalnem pravu pretežno že uveljavljen. V slovenskem pravu bi se bilo treba za uveljavitev obravnavane škode sklicevati tudi na ustrezno pravno podlago, določeno po merilu praeter legem"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-JVUT1M2Q","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-JVUT1M2Q"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-JVUT1M2Q/aa4-c86a6d-09af471f2-6-3d7cdfbdefd40/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-JVUT1M2Q/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-JVUT1M2Q"}}}}