2262 KB53 KB197820252020Milosavljević-Milić, Snežanaštevilka:1letnik:43str. 31-50ISSN:0351-1189COBISSID_HOST:18390019URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-JTUDDU5AenSlovensko društvo za primerjalno književnostPrimerjalna književnostatmosferaatmospherefocalizationfokalizacijanew phenomenologynova fenomenologijapostclassical narratologypostklasična naratologijaNotions of atmosphere| toward the limits of narrative understanding|The change of methodological paradigms, introduced by postclassical narratology and especially its cognitivist orientation, has thus far not reflected on the phenomenon of atmosphere. This is somewhat surprising, if we consider that the contemporary conceptualization of atmosphere and the increased interest in the questions it brings forth arise from new phenomenology and phenomenological aesthetics, fields that have directly initiated the development of postclassical narratology. Starting with the phenomenological concept of atmosphere of M. Merleau-Ponty and H. Schmitz (atmosphere as an ecstasy of experience, a specific modus of presence with a quasi-objective and inter-subjective status fitting into the extra-linguistic framework, atmospheric perception as seizing the surfaceless space) and the aesthetic relevance of the concept (G. Böhme, T. Griffero, E. Fischer-Lichte), this paper will present the terminological instability and semantic vagueness of atmosphere and related terms within the narratological discourse of M. Bal, G. Prince, M-L. Ryan and P. Abbott (atmosphere as receptive and narrative disposition, the accompanying factor of morphological categories, the thematic-psychological distinctive characteristic of genre). The primary objective of the paper is to reexamine the methodological legitimacy of the concept of atmosphere, both regarding the limits of narrative understanding and its interpretative potential which might become relevant within cognitive theories of intertextuality (E. Panagiotidy, M. Juvan), while also being a humanistic response to the challenges of new epistemological paradigms and a return to the transcendental essence of literatureSpremenjene metodološke paradigme, ki jih je prinesla postklasična naratologija in še posebej njena kognitivistična usmeritev, fenomenu atmosfere do zdaj niso posvečale veliko razmisleka. To nekoliko preseneča, če upoštevamo, da sodobna konceptualizacija atmosfere in povečano zanimanje za vprašanja, ki jih prinaša, izhajata iz nove fenomenologije in fenomenološke estetike, področij torej, ki sta neposredno prispevali k razvoju postklasične naratologije. V prispevku začenjam s fenomenološkim konceptom atmosfere po M. Merleau-Pontyju in H. Schmitzu (atmosfera kot ekstaza izkušnje, poseben način prisotnosti s kvaziobjektivnim in intersubjektivnim statusom, ki se prilega zunajjezikovnemu okviru, dojemanje atmosfere kot brezpovršinskosti prostora) in estetskim pomenom tega koncepta (G. Böhme, T. Griffero, E. Fischer-Lichte), nato pa predstavljam terminološko nestabilnost in semantično nejasnost atmosfere ter povezanih izrazov znotraj naratološkega diskurza M. Bal, G. Princea, M-L. Ryan and P. Abbotta (atmosfera kot receptivna in pripovedna naravnanost, spremljevalni dejavnik morfoloških kategorij, tematsko-psihološka značilnost žanra). Najpomembnejši cilj prispevka je, da ponovno preuči metodološko legitimnost koncepta atmosfere, tako kar zadeva meje pripovednega razumevanja kot njenega interpretativnega potenciala, ki bi lahko postal relevanten v okviru kognitivnih teorij intertekstualnosti (E. Panagiotidy, M. Juvan), po drugi strani pa gre tudi za humanistični odgovor na izzive novih epistemoloških paradigem in povratek k transcendentalnemu bistvu literatureTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaSlovensko društvo za primerjalno književnost