302 KB0 KB192120252023Žalec, Bojanštevilka:4letnik:83str. 813-823ISSN:0006-5722DOI:10.34291/BV2023/04/ZalecCOBISSID_HOST:179012611URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-JQIWL8WRslTeološka fakultetaBogoslovni vestnikattribution of intelligence to artificial intelligencedefinicija inteligencedefinition of intelligencegeneralityindependent problem solvingmental attributespripisovanje inteligence umetni inteligencipsihični atributisamostojno reševanje problemovsplošnostAli je umetna inteligenca inteligenca v pravem pomenu besede?| Is artificial intelligence an intelligence in the true sense of the word?| the issue of mental characteristics and generality| vprašanje psihičnih značilnosti in splošnost|The central question of the article is already formulated in the title. The author advocates a minimal definition of intelligence: intelligence is independent problem solving. The level of intelligence depends on the complexity of the problems and the degree of independence in solving them (Klaus Mainzer). According to this definition, the author notes that intelligent machines already exist. These are AI systems that are capable of deep learning. In the paper, the author presents criticisms of the claim that AI is intelligent in the literal sense and not just in the metaphorical sense. These criticisms are based on objections that can be divided into two basic groups. Proponents of the first line of criticism cite mental abilities (such as phenomenal consciousness and awareness) and aliveness as essential attributes of intelligence, rejecting the notion of artificial life as nonsense. Inanimate and non-mental systems are merely adaptive, not intelligent systems. Representatives of the second group claim that the indispensable characteristics of intelligence are generality, intuition, common sense and abduction. The author analyses the aforementioned criticisms and concludes that their proponents have not given good reasons against the minimal definitionSrediščno vprašanje prispevka je formulirano že v naslovu. Avtor zagovarja minimalno definicijo inteligence: inteligenca je samostojno reševanje problemov. Stopnja inteligence je odvisna od kompleksnosti problemov in stopnje samostojnosti njihovega reševanja (Klaus Mainzer). V skladu s to definicijo avtor ugotavlja, da že obstajajo inteligentni stroji. To so sistemi UI,1 ki so zmožni globokega učenja. Avtor v članku predstavlja kritike trditve, da je UI inteligentna v dobesednem pomenu – in ne zgolj metaforičnem. Te kritike temeljijo na ugovorih, ki jih lahko razdelimo v dve osnovni skupini. Zagovorniki prve linije kritike kot bistvene atribute inteligence navajajo psihične zmožnosti (kot sta fenomenalna zavest in zavedanje) in živost, pri čemer pojem umetnega življenja zavračajo kot nesmisel. Neživi in nepsihični sistemi so zgolj prilagodljivi, ne pa inteligentni sistemi. Predstavniki druge skupine trdijo, da so nepogrešljive značilnosti inteligence splošnost, intuicija, zdravorazumskost in zmožnost abdukcije. Avtor omenjene kritike analizira in ugotavlja, da njihovi zagovorniki dobrih razlogov proti minimalni definiciji niso podaliTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Teološka fakulteta