736 KB0 KB200620252021Badovinac, Brankaštevilka:1/220 str.letnik:26DOI:10.3359/oz2126005ISSN:1580-9803COBISSID_HOST:88312323URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-JGSAUM8QslIZUMOrganizacija znanja2015-2020authority recordsbibliografski zapisibibliographic recordsCOBIB.SIdata qualitykakovost podatkovnormativni zapisiquality control of daily productionspremljanje kakovosti dnevne produkcijeSpremljanje kakovosti zapisov dnevne produkcije v COBIB.SI v obdobju od 2015 do 2020| Quality control of daily bibliographic records production in the period from 2015 to 2020|In this paper, the results of an analysis of the data quality performed within quality control of daily bibliographic records production in the period from 2015 to 2020 are presented. The sample included 13,478 bibliographic records with associated authority records. The analysis is based on the data quality dimensions that were attributed to the recorded errors of the reviewed bibliographic and normative records. Also, the individual errors in the context of specific data elements are presented. Furthermore, the results include an indicative quality score of records in terms of the number of messages sent to cataloguers and the performance of the monitoring method in terms of the proportion of records corrected. According to our estimations, some 70% of the records reviewed were good or good enough and the response rate of cataloguers was relatively high. In the discussion, problems with some data elements were highlighted and it was stressed how important it is to keep up to date with changes in the Slovenian cataloguing practiceV prispevku predstavljamo rezultate analize spremljanja kakovosti podatkov v okviru aktivnosti spremljanja kakovosti zapisov dnevne produkcije v COBIB.SI v obdobju od 2015 do 2020. V vzorec je bilo vključenih 13.478 bibliografskih zapisov s pripadajočimi normativnimi zapisi. Analiza temelji na dimenzijah kakovosti podatkov, ki smo jih pripisali beleženim pomanjkljivostim pregledanih bibliografskih in normativnih zapisov. Predstavili smo posamezne pomanjkljivosti v okviru določenih podatkovnih elementov. V rezultate smo vključili tudi okvirno oceno kakovosti zapisov glede na število poslanih sporočil katalogizatorjem in uspešnost metode spremljanja glede na delež popravljenih zapisov. Ocenili smo, da je približno 70 % pregledanih zapisov dobrih ali zadosti dobrih in da je odzivnost katalogizatorjev razmeroma visoka. V diskusiji smo izpostavili težave pri nekaterih podatkovnih elementih in pomen seznanjanja z novostmi v katalogizacijski praksiTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaIZUM - Institut informacijskih znanosti