149 KB0 KB200520252020Mardjonović, BrigitaŠtrumbelj, Boroštevilka:1/2letnik:68str. 235-240ISSN:0353-7455COBISSID:20834307URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-JE2QHWVOslFakulteta za športŠport (Ljubljana)attitude towads dopingcoachescompetitorsdopingjudoknowledge on dopingodnos do dopingaSloveniaSlovenijašporttekmovalcitrenerjiznanje o dopinguRazlike med trenerji in tekmovalci o znanju in odnosu do dopinga v slovenskem judu|The survey involved 91 judo competitors and coaches (57 men and 34 women) from Slovenia. It included competitors from the three eldest age groups: Cadets, Juniors, and Seniors. To collect the data, examinees were required to complete the survey questionnaire and another questionnaire on their Knowledge on Doping (KD). Statistically significant differences between coaches and competitors were found in the opinion on doping in judo. Significantly more coaches thought that doping was present in judo. Confidence in the coach and the nutritionist also showed differences. In the confidence to seek nutritional supplement advice, logically, several competitors responded with a "coach", as all respondents received the same questionnaire. Knowledge about doping and nutritional supplements has been reported by many coaches through education. The difference in the knowledge gained from the coach, for the benefit of the competitors and the competitors, was again detected due to the aforementioned same questionnaire for both the competitors and the coaches. None of the coaches indicated that they had no knowledge. This was not the case for competitors, which proved to be a statistically significant difference. The findings of the research will thus in particular encourage and contribute to the further, improved, education and awareness of doping among Slovenian competitors and coaches in judoNamen raziskave je bil ugotoviti, ali obstajajo razlike o znanju o dopingu in odnosu do dopinga med trenerji in tekmovalci v slovenskem judu. V raziskavo je bilo vključenih 91 tekmovalcev in trenerjev (57 moških in 34 žensk) juda v Sloveniji. Vključene so bile tri najstarejše starostne kategorije tekmovalcev: kadeti in kadetinje, mladinci in mladinke ter člani in članice. Podatki so bili pridobljeni preko anketnega vprašalnika in vprašalnika o znanju o dopingu (Knowledge on Doping - KD). Statistično pomembne razlike med trenerji in trenerkami ter tekmovalci in tekmovalkami so bile pri mnenju o dopingu v judu. Pomembno več trenerjev in trenerk je menilo, da je doping v judu prisoten. Razlike so se pokazale tudi pri zaupanju v trenerja ter strokovnjaka za prehrano. Pri zaupanju glede iskanja nasvetov glede prehranskih dopolnil je logično več tekmovalcev in tekmovalk odgovorilo s "trenerjem", saj so vsi anketiranci dobili isti vprašalnik. Znanje o dopingu in prehranskih dopolnilih je po navedbah pomembno več trenerjev in trenerk pridobilo skozi izobraževanje. Razlika pri pridobljenem znanju od trenerja, v dobrobit tekmovalcev in tekmovalkam, je bila ponovno zaznana zaradi že prej omenjenega istega vprašalnika tako za tekmovalce kot trenerje. Nihče od trenerjev in trenerk ni navedel, da nima znanj. To ni veljalo za tekmovalce in tekmovalke, kar se je izkazalo s statistično pomembno razliko. Ugotovitve raziskave bodo tako predvsem vzpodbudile in prispevale k nadaljnjemu izboljšanemu izobraževanju in ozaveščanju o samem dopingu med slovenskimi tekmovalci in trenerji v juduTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za šport