167 KB588 KB76 KB199120252009Knific, Bojanštevilka:1letnik:19=70ISSN:0354-0316COBISSID:1243782URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-IZR7JN44slSlovenski etnografski muzejEtnolog. Nova vrsta (Ljubljana)ethnologyetnologijaKnific, Bojan, 1971-nošaoblačilna kulturaSlovenciSlovenesterminologijaterminologyzgodovinski preglediO neustreznosti enačenja obleke z nošo|The article deals with the terms used from the 16th century on to describe dressing and what resulted from it - dresses. It dedicates special attention to how (in)adequate the term noša (costume in the sense of ethnic dress) is for denoting what people wear on their bodies, and in comparison prefers the terms dress and dressing style. Dress is a term used in science as well as in everyday speech, but unlike noša the range of meanings it covers is not limited temporally, socially, or spatially, and the same is true of dressing style, a term which because of its almost exclusively scientific use has not acquired any additional meanings distorting its original definition in the part three decadesV prispevku avtor obravnava izraze, ki so se od 16. stoletja naprej uporabljali za opisovanje oblačenja in tega, kar se kaže kot rezultat oblačenja - obleke. Posebno pozornost namenja vprašanju ustreznosti izraza noša za označevanje tega, kar je na človekovem telesu zaznavnega, in v primerjavi z njo daje prednost obleki in oblačilnem videzu. Obleka je izraz, ki se uporablja v znanosti in v vsakdanjem govoru, a pomensko polje, ki ga pokriva, v nasprotju z nošo ni časovno, družbeno in prostorsko omejeno, podobno pa je tudi z oblačilnim videzom, ki zaradi skoraj izključno znanstvene rabe v zadnjih treh desetletjih ni pridobil dodatnih pomenov, ki bi zameglili njegovo prvotno definicijoBeseda o avtorju = About the authorTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaSlovenski etnografski muzej