<Record><identifier xmlns="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">URN:NBN:SI:doc-I9FPHPMP</identifier><date>2017</date><creator>Vincelette, Alan Roy</creator><relation>documents/doc/I/URN_NBN_SI_doc-I9FPHPMP_001.pdf</relation><relation>documents/doc/I/URN_NBN_SI_doc-I9FPHPMP_001.txt</relation><format format_type="issue">3/4</format><format format_type="volume">77</format><format format_type="type">article</format><format format_type="extent">str. 637-653</format><identifier identifier_type="ISSN">0006-5722</identifier><identifier identifier_type="COBISSID">7814746</identifier><identifier identifier_type="URN">URN:NBN:SI:doc-I9FPHPMP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Teološka fakulteta</publisher><source>Bogoslovni vestnik</source><rights>InC</rights><subject language_type_id="slv">etika</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">Grotius, Hugo</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">moralna teologija</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">neresnica</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">resnica</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">Skalko, John</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">Tollefsen, Christopher</subject><title>a response to Tollefsen and Skalko</title><title>On the warranted falsehood, or in defense of the Grotian qualifier</title></Record>