{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-I1DS21WR/94f8a723-938b-4b37-8e1e-2fc26a433d51/PDF","dcterms:extent":"230 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-I1DS21WR/a4640084-efbc-4d7b-ad82-80a3170f0ad7/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"0 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2005-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2005"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-I1DS21WR","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-OTYUOTZX"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Šport (Ljubljana)"}],"dcterms:issued":"2023","dc:creator":["Breznikar, Žan","Spudić, Darjan","Trbovšek, Pia"],"dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:1/2"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:71"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 192-198"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0353-7455","COBISSID:159958787","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-I1DS21WR"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Fakulteta za šport"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"dvotočkovna metoda"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"gibanje"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"pettočkovna metoda"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"profil"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"skoki"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"šport"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"študije"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2005-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Kriterijska veljavnost dvotočkovne metode za ocenjevanje profila sila-hitrost-moč|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"The purpose of this study was to investigate the criterion validity of the two-point method for Force-velocity-Power (F-v-P) relationship assessment. F-v-P outcome variables calculated using the two-point method were compared with the same variables calculated using the five-point method, which was chosen as the credible criterion. The second objective of this study was to investigate whether the validity of the two-point method correlated with the maximum strength of the participants. Fortyfour students from the Faculty of Sport participated in the study. Incremental load counter movement jumps test and an isometric knee extensor strength (KES) tests were performed. Paired-samples t-test revealed statistically significant differences between the two methods for maximal theoretical power (Pmax ) (p < 0,05). No differences were found for maximal theoretical force (F0 ), maximal theoretical velocity (v0) and slope of the force-velocity curve (slope F-v) (all p > 0,05). Using Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients, we did not find statistically significant correlations between the differences of the methods in F-v-P outcomes and KES (p > 0,05). The main findings of our study were that, with the exception of Pmax , the F-v-P outcomes can be credibly calculated using the 2-point method (where low load corresponds to the body mass condition and high load corresponds to additional 80% body mass condition) and that the results are not correlated with the strength of the participants"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Namen študije je bil preveriti veljavnost dvotočkovne metode ocenjevanja mehanskih lastnosti mišic z odnosom sila-hitrost-moč (F-v-P). Izhodne spremenljivke odnosa F-v-P, izračunane z dvotočkovno metodo, smo primerjali s pettočkovno metodo, ki smo jo izbrali kot kredibilen kriterij. Drugi namen študije je bil preveriti, ali je verodostojnost dvotočkovne metode povezana z maksimalno močjo športnikov pri iztegu kolena na izometrični upornici (NHIK). V študiji je sodelovalno 44 študentov Fakultete za šport. Izvedeni so bili skoki z nasprotnim gibanjem s petimi različno težkimi bremeni. S t-testom za odvisne vzorce smo ugotovili statistično značilne razlike med metodama samo za največjo teoretično moč (Pmax ) (p < 0,05), medtem ko statistično značilnih razlik v največji teoretični sili (F0 ), največji teoretični hitrosti (v0 ) in naklonu krivulje sila-hitrost (naklon F-v) nismo odkrili (vse p > 0,05). S Pearsonovim oziroma Spearmanovim korelacijskim koeficientom nismo ugotovili statistično značilne povezanosti med razlikami v izhodnih spremenljivkah odnosa F-v-P med meto- dama in NHIK (p > 0,05). Glavni ugotovitvi naše raziskave sta, da je – razen Pmax – izhodne spremenljivke odnosa F-v- -P pri skokih z nasprotnim gibanjem z dodatnimi bremeni (F0 , v0 in naklon F-v) mogoče verodostojno oceniti z dvotočkovno metodo (pri čemer lažje breme predstavlja telesna masa posameznika in težje breme olimpijska palica z 80 % telesne mase preiskovanca) in da rezultati niso povezani z močjo preiskovancev"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-I1DS21WR","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-I1DS21WR"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-I1DS21WR/94f8a723-938b-4b37-8e1e-2fc26a433d51/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za šport"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-I1DS21WR/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-I1DS21WR"}}}}