<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-HJNPWBWR/3b87051b-b0ba-46d6-a85f-fcd526b46a38/PDF"><dcterms:extent>435 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-HJNPWBWR/8ed4e179-986a-4bfb-adc4-af4f2c6f1ee2/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>0 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1965-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1965</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-HJNPWBWR"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-ETPSIC7M" /><dcterms:issued>2025</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Hlebec, Valentina</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kogovšek, Tina</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lobe, Bojana</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lozar Manfreda, Katja</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:3</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:62</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 681-700</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0040-3598</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI:10.51936/tip.62.3.681</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID_HOST:255480323</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-HJNPWBWR</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Fakulteta za družbene vede</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Teorija in praksa</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">data quality</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Fokusne skupine</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">kakovost podatkov</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">offline focus group</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">online focus group</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">pretesting survey questions</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">sinhroni klepet</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">spletne fokusne skupine</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">synchronous chat</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">testiranje anketnih vprašanj</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">tradicionalne fokusne skupine</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Vprašalniki</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1965-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Comparison of offline and online focus groups for pretesting sensitive survey questionnaires|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">The study compares traditional synchronous offline focus groups with synchronous online focus groups using chat to pretest survey questions on a sensitive topic. Despite expecting higher data quality in the online focus groups due to their private setting, the comparison of 42 focus groups (21 of each type) revealed minimal differences in data quantity and quality. Moreover, the differences observed were attributed to transcript quality, the moderators’ experience, and social skills, participant homogeneity, and familiarity among participants, rather than the focus group setting. This suggests online focus groups can provide a viable alternative or complement to offline focus groups for pretesting sensitive survey questions, especially when faced with cost constraints, epidemic, large geographical distances, or other limits on face-to-face interactions</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Študija primerja tradicionalne sinhrone fokusne skupine s sinhronimi spletnimi fokusnimi skupinami (s pisnim klepetom) za testiranje občutljivih anketnih vprašanj. Kljub pričakovani višji kakovosti podatkov v spletnih fokusnih skupinah zaradi bolj zasebne situacije je primerjava 42 fokusnih skupin (po 21 za vsak tip) pokazala minimalne razlike v količini in kakovosti podatkov, zaznane razlike pa so bolj rezultat kakovosti prepisov, izkušenj in socialnih veščin moderatorjev, homogenosti in medsebojnega poznavanja udeležencev kot pa tipa fokusnih skupin. To nakazuje, da so spletne fokusne skupine lahko alternativa ali dopolnilo tradicionalnim fokusnim skupinam za testiranje občutljivih anketnih vprašanj, zlasti v primeru stroškovnih omejitev, epidemij, večjih geografskih razdalj ali drugih omejitev pri osebnih interakcijah</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-HJNPWBWR"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-HJNPWBWR" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-HJNPWBWR/3b87051b-b0ba-46d6-a85f-fcd526b46a38/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-HJNPWBWR/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-HJNPWBWR" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>