<Record><identifier xmlns="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">URN:NBN:SI:doc-HAESE8PW</identifier><date>2011</date><creator>Pilario, Daniel Franklin E.</creator><relation>documents/doc/H/URN_NBN_SI_doc-HAESE8PW_001.htm</relation><relation>documents/doc/H/URN_NBN_SI_doc-HAESE8PW_001.pdf</relation><relation>documents/doc/H/URN_NBN_SI_doc-HAESE8PW_001.txt</relation><format format_type="issue">3</format><format format_type="volume">71</format><format format_type="type">article</format><format format_type="extent">str. 327-344</format><identifier identifier_type="ISSN">0006-5722</identifier><identifier identifier_type="COBISSID">5551450</identifier><identifier identifier_type="URN">URN:NBN:SI:doc-HAESE8PW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Družina</publisher><source>Bogoslovni vestnik</source><rights>InC</rights><subject language_type_id="slv">Azija</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">medverski dialog</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">pluralizem</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">religija</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">religion</subject><title>Attempts by Asian theologians to evolve a viable theology of religious pluralism and dialogue for our times</title></Record>