174 KB51 KB201320242015Hasanbegović, Jasminkaštevilka:3/4letnik:70str. 155-170, 271-272ISSN:0032-6976COBISSID:14340177URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-H7OFXCZ6enZveza društev pravnikov SlovenijePravnikdružbena neenakostenakostpravičnostpravna načela(In)equality of human beings| eternal - premodern, modern and postmodern - or outdated legal idea?|This paper focuses on the idea of legal equality of human beings, and raises the following questions: Have the two Peters, Peter Westen and Peter Unger, been right when talking respectively of the empty idea of equality and empty ideas in general while criticizing analytic philosophy? Is the idea of legal equality of human beings empty, i.e. outdated? Can the idea of justice exist without the idea of equality? When did the equality of human beings arise as a legal idea? Was it in Ancient Greece? Which sophists argued for it? How did Aristotle understand it? What did the stoics think? Then, what was afterwards the perspective of Christianity and of all its different teachings (i.e. churches) on this idea, as well as on the legal practices radically denying it in modern times? Who was the liber homo from Magna Carta Libertatum, and how did liber homo become homo? And how did in modern times man transform into a human being who can be both male and female? Or, conversely, how did in modern times women, the coloured, the poor, the illiterate, the heterodox and foreigners become human beings? What are the legal problems of the modern era that, before even being resolved, have been further enlarged and complicated by the postmodern equality issues (e.g. positive discrimination, the new, wider concept of legal subjectivity, legal protection of minorities, changed view on human homosexuality)?Razprava se osredotoča na pojem pravne enakosti človeških bitij in zastavlja naslednja vprašanja: Imata oba Petra (Peter Westen in Peter Unger) prav, ko ob kritiki analitične filozofije vsak zase govorita o praznem pojmu enakosti in praznih pojmih sploh? Je pojem pravne enakosti človeških bitij prazen, to je zastarel? Ali lahko brez pojma enakosti obstaja pojem pravičnosti? Kdaj je enakost človeških bitij postala pravni pojem? Je bilo to v stari Grčiji? Kateri sofisti so se zavzemali zanj? Kako ga je pojmoval Aristotel? Kaj so si predstav-ljali stoiki? Kakšen je bil na ta pojem pozneje pogled krščanstva in vseh njegovih različnih naukov (tj. cerkva) kakor tudi na pravne prakse, ki ga v sodobnem času radikalno odklanjajo? Kdo je bil liber homo iz Magne Carte Libertatum in kako je liber homo postal homo? In kako se je v sodobnih časih mož preoblikoval v človeško bitje, ki je lahko oboje, moški in ženska? Ali obratno, kako so v sodobnih časih ženske, temnopolti, ubogi, nepismeni, drugoverski in tujci postali človeška bitja? Kateri so tisti pravni problemi moderne dobe, ki so jih postmodernistične posledice enakosti dodatno razširile in zapletle, še preden so bili rešeni (na primer pozitivna diskriminacija, novi, širši koncept pravne subjektivitete, pravna zaščita manjšin, spremenjeni pogled na človeško homoseksualnost)?TEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Pravna fakulteta