{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-GATQ8NUO/0a2f0ba6-696c-456f-b6cb-4bf5e66a04e5/PDF","dcterms:extent":"460 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-GATQ8NUO/cfc1b31a-0cff-42f5-8866-82ab7b34eac1/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"48 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"1948-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"1948"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-GATQ8NUO","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-QOIKGUTE"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Slavistična revija"}],"dcterms:issued":"2016","dc:creator":"Tomažin, Andrej","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:3"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:64"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 299-313"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0350-6894","COBISSID:62394210","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-GATQ8NUO"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Slavistično društvo Slovenije"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"\"Martin Kačur\""},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Cankar, Ivan, 1876-1918"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"eng"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"ideologija"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"ideology"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"literarna teorija"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"literarne študije"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"literary theory"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"literay theory"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"marksizem"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"marxism"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"mit"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"myth"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"mythology"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"nacionalna književnost"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"national literature"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"novel"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"roman"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Slovene literary studies"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Slovene literature"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"slovenska književnost"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"1948-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Interpretacije Cankarjevega Martina Kačurja med mitom, vedo in teorijo|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"The article examines interpretations of Ivan Cankar's Martin Kačur (1904) in Slovene literary studies. Based on post-Marxist theory (Althusser, Močnik, Jameson), it tries to find structural shifts within textual interpretations, which, according to Močnik, lead from mythographic interpretations toward literary studies per se. Izidor Cankar's afterword that accompanies Ivan Cankar's first collected works of 1929 tries to break through the mythographic practice of the previous interpretations. The same can be said for Taras Kermauner: with his interpretation of previous, particularly post-war readings, which were closely connected to the hegemonic ideology of vulgar communism, Kermauner entered the field of literary studies as Močnik sees it. Post-Kermauner interpretations do not take Kermauner's interpretations into consideration; rather, they mostly return to the thought of Izidor Cankar or even further into the mythographic matrix"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Članek preučuje interpretacije Martina Kačurja (1904) Ivana Cankarja. Prek teoretičnega uvida postmarksistične teorije (Althusser, Močnik in Jameson) poskuša znotraj tekstualnih intepretacij najti strukturne premike, ki po Močniku vodijo od mitografskih interpretacij k slovstveni vedi. Spremna beseda, ki jo je leta 1929 Izidor Cankar zapisal k prvim zbranim delom Ivana Cankarja, poskuša mitografijo predhodnih interpretacij prebiti, prav tako Kermauner, ki z interpretacijo predhodnih, predvsem povojnih branj, vezanih na hegemono ideologijo vulgarnega komunizma, zares stopi v slovstveno vedo, kakor jo razume Močnik. Poznejše interpretacije Kermaunerja ne upoštevajo, temveč se največkrat vračajo k razmislekom Izidorja Cankarja ali celo nazaj v mitografsko matrico"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-GATQ8NUO","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-GATQ8NUO"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-GATQ8NUO/0a2f0ba6-696c-456f-b6cb-4bf5e66a04e5/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Slavistično društvo Slovenije"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-GATQ8NUO/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-GATQ8NUO"}}}}