<Record><identifier xmlns="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">URN:NBN:SI:doc-FKLQCFKJ</identifier><date>1992</date><creator>Gaeng, Paul A.</creator><relation>documents/doc/F/URN_NBN_SI_doc-FKLQCFKJ_001.pdf</relation><relation>documents/doc/F/URN_NBN_SI_doc-FKLQCFKJ_001.txt</relation><format format_type="issue">2</format><format format_type="volume">32</format><format format_type="extent">32, št. 2 (1992), str. 19-29</format><format format_type="type">article</format><identifier identifier_type="ISSN">0024-3922</identifier><identifier identifier_type="COBISSID">52204800</identifier><identifier identifier_type="URN">URN:NBN:SI:doc-FKLQCFKJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Univerza v Ljubljani, Filozofska fakulteta</publisher><source>Linguistica (Ljubljana)</source><rights>InC</rights><subject language_type_id="eng">Latin</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">latinščina</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">linguistics</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">lingvistika</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">romanski jeziki</subject><title>The extent to which inscriptional evidence may serve as a source of "vulgar," i.e. spoken Latin</title></Record>